Skip to content

GSPY vs WTV

Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF

GSPYCNYSE Arca

WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

WTVANYSE Arca

Overlap

21.9%by weight

Expense ratio

WTV −0.38pt a year

GSPY0.50%WTV0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

WTV 33.5×the volume

GSPY5KWTV167K

5Y return · a year

WTV +1.1pt

GSPY+12.6%WTV+13.7%

GSPY vs WTV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+80.7%GSPY+89.6%WTV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GSPY +80.7%. WTV +89.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%50%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GSPY 0.50%
WTV 0.12%, better
Fund size
GSPY $704M
WTV $3.33B
1Y total return
GSPY +14.9%
WTV +20.9%, better
Yield (12M)
GSPY 2.30%, better
WTV 2.00%
Holdings
GSPY 501
WTV 126
Avg volume (30D)
GSPY 5K sh
WTV 167K sh, better
NAV per share
GSPY $41.90
WTV $106.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GSPY: Cost 57, Risk 43, Mission 78, Tradability 48, Holdings 46, Durability 67. WTV: Cost 100, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 89, Holdings 84, Durability 90.
Pillar letters and Scores for GSPY, WTV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGSPYWTV
Cost30% weightB57A100Higher
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightC43B56Higher
Tradability15% weightC48A89Higher
Holdings10% weightC46A84Higher
Durability5% weightB67A90Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GSPY and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

WTV ranks 1st and GSPY 32nd of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 1AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 86
  3. Rank 3ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 31CFBCVFidelity Blue Chip Value ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 32CGSPYGotham Enhanced 500 ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 33CGVLEGoldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GSPYCGotham Enhanced 500 ETF

WTVAWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

In short

GSPY Same 500 companies as the index, reshuffled. This active fund lets the sub-adviser's valuation work set position sizes instead of market cap, so the biggest company doesn't automatically get the biggest slot.

WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.

Stated mandate

GSPY The actively managed fund generally invests in companies included in the S&P 500 Index and weights them using the sub-adviser’s valuation assessment rather than passively tracking the index.

WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.

Why people hold it

  • GSPY Familiar universe, different math: it holds S&P 500 companies but weights them on the sub-adviser's valuation assessment rather than passively tracking the index.
  • The 0.50% annual fee sits under the 0.55% midpoint for active large-cap value funds, which is unusual for a discretionary, stock-by-stock strategy.
  • Trading since December 2020, so the value framework has a live record in real markets rather than a backtest.
  • The value tilt is stated in the prospectus, not implied: a proprietary analytical framework drives the weighting decisions.
  • WTV Charges 0.12% a year, under a quarter of the 0.55% typical for active US value funds, and less than every same-benchmark rival in its group (JAVA 0.44%, CGVV 0.33%, TEQI 0.54%).
  • "Value" here means cash returned: dividend yield plus net buyback yield, with quality and profitability screens, rather than a plain low price-to-book sort.wisdomtree.com
  • About 160 US stocks, a multi-billion-dollar asset base, and a live track record dating to 2007. Distributions land quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • GSPY You pay for the human layer. Rules-based value peers such as WTV (0.12%) and AVLV (0.15%) charge a fraction of this fund's fee.
  • It trades thinly next to the index heavyweights, so spreads can widen on larger orders.
  • Distributions arrive once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • WTV Full equity with no downside cushion, and a value tilt that can lean into a handful of sectors. Risk is the least polished part of the profile.
  • Rules-based active, not an index tracker, so results can diverge from the Russell 1000 Value in either direction.
  • Buybacks supply much of the shareholder yield, and companies can scale repurchases back more easily than they cut dividends.wisdomtree.com

Full GSPY profile⁠

Full WTV profile⁠

GSPY vs WTV Holdings

How GSPY and WTV differ

Overlap by weight

21.9%

Shared holdings make up 69.8% of WTV and 28.6% of GSPY.

Level by level

  • Holdings83 in both21.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors73.6%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in GSPY and WTV, widest gap first
SectorMore in GSPYMore in WTV
TechnologyGSPY +18.9 points
FinancialsWTV +10.7 points
UtilitiesWTV +4.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryGSPY +3.9 points
Consumer StaplesWTV +3.8 points
EnergyWTV +3.0 points
CommunicationGSPY +2.7 points
Real EstateWTV +2.6 points
IndustrialsWTV +1.5 points
MaterialsWTV +0.9 points
Health CareGSPY +0.7 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GSPY and WTV, widest gap first
CountryMore in GSPYMore in WTV
SwedenWTV +0.5 points
Other countries (6)GSPY +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GSPY39.0%
  • WTV21.1%

Securities held

  • GSPY500
  • WTV124

Asset class

GSPY
Equity
WTV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GSPY417
  • In both83
  • Only in WTV41

Only in GSPY

417 securities, 71.3% of GSPY by weight

  • Apple Inc7.28%
  • Microsoft Corp6.69%
  • Alphabet Inc4.76%

Only in WTV

41 securities, 30.0% of WTV by weight

  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.73%
  • Ryder System Inc1.25%
  • Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc1.18%

Weight gaps

All 83 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GSPY and WTV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GSPYMore in WTV
NVIDIA CorpNVDAGSPY +2.95 points
Salesforce IncCRMWTV +2.14 points
Micron Technology IncMUGSPY +1.92 points
Chevron CorpCVXWTV +1.81 points
Thermo Fisher Scientific IncTMOWTV +1.67 points
Target CorpTGTWTV +1.63 points
Southwest Airlines CoLUVWTV +1.51 points
Meta Platforms IncMETAGSPY +1.47 points

All GSPY holdings⁠All 157 WTV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GSPY vs WTV Cost

Overpaying GSPY vs WTV

$7,459

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GSPY 0.50%

    $9,979

  • WTV 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GSPY 0.50%
  • WTV 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GSPY $9,979WTV $2,520

Year by year

YearGSPYWTVOverpaying
10$900$220$680
20$3,460$859$2,601
30$9,979$2,520$7,459

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GSPY
  • 0.12%WTV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.54%

WTV cheapest of 64 funds

GSPY 26th cheapest of 64 funds

GSPY vs WTV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GSPY 2.30%, better
WTV 2.00%
Payout (12M)
GSPY $0.96
WTV $2.14
Last payment
GSPY $0.96
WTV $0.55
Ex-dividend
GSPY Dec 10, 2025
WTV Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
GSPY Dec 11, 2025
WTV Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
GSPY Annual
WTV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GSPYAnnual · 5 paymentsAll GSPY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2021 $0.06; Dec 22, 2022 $0.26; Dec 22, 2023 $0.28; Dec 10, 2024 $0.27; Dec 10, 2025 $0.96. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
WTVQuarterly · 43 paymentsAll WTV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 43 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 27, 2017 $0.11; Jun 26, 2017 $0.15; Sep 26, 2017 $0.15; Dec 26, 2017 $0.17; Mar 20, 2018 $0.11; Jun 25, 2018 $0.16; Sep 25, 2018 $0.24; Dec 24, 2018 $0.22; Mar 26, 2019 $0.12; Jun 24, 2019 $0.15; Sep 24, 2019 $0.21; Dec 23, 2019 $0.20; Mar 24, 2020 $0.15; Jun 23, 2020 $0.19; Sep 22, 2020 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.27; Dec 30, 2020 $0.04; Mar 25, 2021 $0.22; Jun 24, 2021 $0.24; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 27, 2021 $0.27; Mar 25, 2022 $0.23; Jun 24, 2022 $0.33; Sep 26, 2022 $0.32; Dec 23, 2022 $0.32; Mar 27, 2023 $0.20; Jun 26, 2023 $0.29; Sep 25, 2023 $0.26; Dec 22, 2023 $0.35; Dec 28, 2023 $0.02; Mar 22, 2024 $0.28; Jun 25, 2024 $0.32; Sep 25, 2024 $0.36; Dec 26, 2024 $0.33; Dec 31, 2024 $0.01; Mar 26, 2025 $0.32; Jun 25, 2025 $0.31; Sep 25, 2025 $0.38; Dec 26, 2025 $0.46; Dec 31, 2025 $0.02; Mar 26, 2026 $0.52; Jun 25, 2026 $0.59; Sep 25, 2026 $0.55. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

GSPY vs WTV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GSPY
  • WTV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GSPY −23.3% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GSPY 12.0%, betterWTV 13.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GSPY 1.47, betterWTV 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GSPY −23.3%WTV −19.3%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GSPY 0.96WTV 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • GSPYCvsAVLVA

    Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WTVAvsAVLVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSPYCvsSEIVA

    Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WTVAvsSEIVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSPYCvsDFLVA

    Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WTVAvsDFLVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.