DFLV ranks 4th and PJFV 20th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs PJFV
DFLV −0.12pt a year
0.21%0.33%
DFLV 30.2×the volume
658K21.8K
PJFV +3.6pt
+21.8%+25.4%
DFLV vs PJFV Performance
+29.6%+24.6%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- PJFV 0.33%
- DFLV $7.39B
- PJFV $209M
- DFLV +29.6%, better
- PJFV +24.6%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- PJFV 0.56%
- DFLV 336
- PJFV 38
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- PJFV 21.8K sh
- DFLV $41.86
- PJFV $100.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | PJFV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A79 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D39 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B59 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and PJFV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
PJFVB
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
PJFV Human stock pickers running a deliberately short list of undervalued large caps, at 0.33% a year. Most active value funds charge more; most of the cheap rivals are quant machines. This one is judgment, priced close to the robots.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
PJFV Seeks long-term capital growth through a focused portfolio investing predominantly in large-capitalization companies that the adviser considers undervalued relative to their perceived worth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs PJFV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs PJFV Cost
Overpaying PJFV vs DFLV
$2,380
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
PJFV 0.33%
$6,737
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | PJFV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $598 | $215 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $2,318 | $827 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $6,737 | $2,380 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.33%PJFV
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
PJFV 13th cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs PJFV Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- PJFV 0.56%
- DFLV $0.57
- PJFV $0.57
- DFLV $0.16
- PJFV $0.57
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- PJFV Dec 30, 2025
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- PJFV Jan 2, 2026
- DFLV Quarterly
- PJFV Annual
Distribution history
DFLV vs PJFV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%PJFV 11.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38PJFV 1.71, better
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%PJFV −18.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80PJFV 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.