WTV ranks 2nd and PJFV 20th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
PJFV vs WTV
WTV −0.21pt a year
0.33%0.12%
WTV 7.7×the volume
21.8K167K
PJFV +2.3pt
+25.4%+23.1%
PJFV vs WTV Performance
+24.6%+21.6%
- PJFV 0.33%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- PJFV $209M
- WTV $3.33B
- PJFV +24.6%, better
- WTV +21.6%
- PJFV 0.56%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- PJFV 38
- WTV 126
- PJFV 21.8K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- PJFV $100.96
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PJFV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | C52 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. PJFV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PJFVB
WTVA
In short
PJFV Human stock pickers running a deliberately short list of undervalued large caps, at 0.33% a year. Most active value funds charge more; most of the cheap rivals are quant machines. This one is judgment, priced close to the robots.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
PJFV Seeks long-term capital growth through a focused portfolio investing predominantly in large-capitalization companies that the adviser considers undervalued relative to their perceived worth.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PJFV vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PJFV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying PJFV vs WTV
$4,217
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PJFV 0.33%
$6,737
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PJFV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $220 | $378 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $859 | $1,459 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $2,520 | $4,217 |
- 0.33%PJFV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
PJFV 13th cheapest of 64 funds
PJFV vs WTV Dividends
- PJFV 0.56%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- PJFV $0.57
- WTV $2.14
- PJFV $0.57
- WTV $0.55
- PJFV Dec 30, 2025
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- PJFV Jan 2, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- PJFV Annual
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
PJFV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PJFV 11.8%, betterWTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PJFV 1.71, betterWTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- PJFV −18.1%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PJFV 0.83WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.