DFSV ranks 3rd and TMFS 35th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
DFSV vs TMFS
DFSV −0.55pt a year
0.30%0.85%
DFSV 220.0×the volume
944K4.29K
DFSV +10.4pt
+19.9%+9.5%
DFSV vs TMFS Performance
+27.6%−0.5%
- DFSV 0.30%, better
- TMFS 0.85%
- DFSV $27.8B
- TMFS $52M
- DFSV +27.6%, better
- TMFS −0.5%
- DFSV 1.38%, better
- TMFS 0.00%
- DFSV 1053
- TMFS 33
- DFSV 944K sh, better
- TMFS 4.29K sh
- DFSV $39.41
- TMFS $34.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFSV | TMFS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | F8 |
| Mission | B62 | A74Higher |
| Risk | B59Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A80Higher | F20 |
| Durability | A97Higher | C52 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. DFSV and TMFS are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFSVA
TMFSF
In short
DFSV Small-cap value, spread wide: roughly a thousand of the market's cheaper small companies, measured against the Russell 2000 Value Index. A deeper bench than most rivals carry, at a higher price than the plain index funds beside it.
TMFS The Motley Fool's stock-picking bench in an ETF wrapper: an actively managed basket of US small caps chosen for quality and growth, with no index to hide behind and a fee that reflects the human effort.
Stated mandate
DFSV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
TMFS The actively managed ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of small-capitalization companies. It uses a quality-growth approach and generally invests at least 80% of net assets in small-cap companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFSV vs TMFS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFSV vs TMFS Cost
Overpaying TMFS vs DFSV
$10,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFSV 0.30%
$6,149
TMFS 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFSV | TMFS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,508 | $963 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,706 | $3,593 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $16,199 | $10,050 |
- 0.30%DFSV, cheaper
- 0.85%TMFS
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
DFSV 4th cheapest of 39 funds
TMFS 36th cheapest of 39 funds
DFSV vs TMFS Dividends
- DFSV 1.38%, better
- TMFS 0.00%
- DFSV $0.54
- TMFS None
- DFSV $0.15
- TMFS
- DFSV Sep 22, 2026
- TMFS
- DFSV Sep 24, 2026
- TMFS
- DFSV Quarterly
- TMFS
Distribution history
DFSV vs TMFS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFSV 18.4%, betterTMFS 20.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFSV 0.84, betterTMFS 0.32
- Worst fall
- DFSV −28.0%TMFS −44.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DFSV 1.04TMFS 1.02
DFSV and TMFS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

