FESM ranks 2nd and TMFS 35th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs TMFS
FESM −0.57pt a year
0.28%0.85%
FESM 237.5×the volume
1.02M4.29K
FESM vs TMFS Performance
+23.4%−0.5%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- TMFS 0.85%
- FESM $6.41B
- TMFS $52M
- FESM +23.4%, better
- TMFS −0.5%
- FESM 0.86%, better
- TMFS 0.00%
- FESM 892
- TMFS 33
- FESM 1.02M sh, better
- TMFS 4.29K sh
- FESM $45.47
- TMFS $34.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | TMFS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A74 |
| Risk | C54Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | F20 |
| Durability | A93Higher | C52 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and TMFS are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
TMFSF
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
TMFS The Motley Fool's stock-picking bench in an ETF wrapper: an actively managed basket of US small caps chosen for quality and growth, with no index to hide behind and a fee that reflects the human effort.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
TMFS The actively managed ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of small-capitalization companies. It uses a quality-growth approach and generally invests at least 80% of net assets in small-cap companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs TMFS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs TMFS Cost
Overpaying TMFS vs FESM
$10,444
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
TMFS 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | TMFS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,508 | $999 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $5,706 | $3,730 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $16,199 | $10,444 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.85%TMFS
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
TMFS 36th cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs TMFS Dividends
- FESM 0.86%, better
- TMFS 0.00%
- FESM $0.39
- TMFS None
- FESM $0.10
- TMFS
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- TMFS
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- TMFS
- FESM Quarterly
- TMFS
Distribution history
FESM vs TMFS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%TMFS 20.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97TMFS 0.32
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%TMFS −44.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.34TMFS 1.02
FESM and TMFS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

