DIVB ranks 2nd of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DIVB vs ILCV
ILCV −0.01pt a year
0.05%0.04%
DIVB 12.2×the volume
290K23.7K
DIVB +1.5pt
+14.1%+12.6%
DIVB vs ILCV Performance
+93.0%+81.2%
- DIVB 0.05%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- DIVB $2.24B
- ILCV $1.37B
- DIVB +36.6%, better
- ILCV +21.2%
- DIVB 2.12%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- DIVB 384
- ILCV 375
- DIVB 290K sh, better
- ILCV 23.7K sh
- DIVB $70.76
- ILCV $109.51
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | DIVB | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95 | A99 |
| Mission | A87 | A82 |
| Risk | A74 | A89 |
| Tradability | B64 | B64 |
| Holdings | B58 | C40 |
| Durability | A71 | A82 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
ILCV ranks 2nd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
Our read on each fund
DIVBA
ILCVA
In short
DIVB Most dividend funds only count the check that hits your account. DIVB's index also counts buybacks, treating a shrinking share count as cash returned to owners, and it charges five basis points to do it.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
DIVB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies selected for a history of dividend payments and/or share buybacks, providing equity exposure oriented toward income and long-term growth.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIVB vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIVB vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying DIVB vs ILCV
$211
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIVB 0.05%
$1,060
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIVB | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $73 | $19 |
| 20 | $360 | $288 | $72 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $849 | $211 |
- 0.05%DIVB
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
DIVB among 52 US Dividend Index funds
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DIVB 2nd cheapest of 52 funds
ILCV among 99 US Multifactor funds
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
DIVB vs ILCV Dividends
- DIVB 2.12%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- DIVB $1.48
- ILCV $1.65
- DIVB $0.42
- ILCV $0.42
- DIVB Sep 15, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- DIVB Sep 18, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- DIVB Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
DIVB vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DIVB
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIVB 13.4%ILCV 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DIVB 1.31ILCV 1.31Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- DIVB −21.1%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DIVB 0.88ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.08%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.