DMXF ranks 3rd and FEDM 4th of 18 funds in the International ESG & Values Index Category.
DMXF vs FEDM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.12%0.12%
DMXF 37.2×the volume
75.7K2.03K
FEDM +0.9pt
+6.7%+7.6%
DMXF vs FEDM Performance
+38.6%+44.1%
- DMXF 0.12%
- FEDM 0.12%
- DMXF $1.04B
- FEDM $86M
- DMXF +14.0%
- FEDM +15.7%, better
- DMXF 4.22%, better
- FEDM 2.88%
- DMXF 408
- FEDM 231
- DMXF 75.7K sh, better
- FEDM 2.03K sh
- DMXF $83.48
- FEDM $64.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DMXF | FEDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A88 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D36 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | C45 | B60Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | C40 |
Rank among International ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. DMXF and FEDM are both graded against the same 18 International ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DMXFA
FEDMA
In short
DMXF The strict one. Where iShares' ESG Aware EAFE fund screens five controversial businesses, DMXF screens fourteen, including the whole energy sector, and charges less than its lighter-screened sibling to do it.
FEDM Northern Trust writes the index and runs the fund: a developed-ex-US core holding screened on its own ESG and climate scoring, at 0.12% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
DMXF The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada, while incorporating positive environmental, social, and governance characteristics.
FEDM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DMXF vs FEDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DMXF vs FEDM Cost
Same expense ratio
$2,520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DMXF 0.12%
$2,520
FEDM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DMXF | FEDM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $220 |
| 20 | $859 | $859 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $2,520 |
- 0.12%DMXF
- 0.12%FEDM
- Middle half of International ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.23%
DMXF 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
FEDM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
DMXF vs FEDM Dividends
- DMXF 4.22%, better
- FEDM 2.88%
- DMXF $3.54
- FEDM $1.86
- DMXF $1.03
- FEDM $0.26
- DMXF Jun 15, 2026
- FEDM Sep 18, 2026
- DMXF Jun 18, 2026
- FEDM Sep 24, 2026
- DMXF Twice a year
- FEDM Quarterly
Distribution history
DMXF vs FEDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DMXF
- FEDM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DMXF 12.8%FEDM 11.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DMXF 1.06FEDM 1.14, better
- Worst fall
- DMXF −33.7%FEDM −29.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DMXF 0.86FEDM 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.