FEDM ranks 4th and EFAX 5th of 18 funds in the International ESG & Values Index Category.
EFAX vs FEDM
FEDM −0.08pt a year
0.20%0.12%
EFAX 9.2×the volume
18.7K2.03K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+7.6%+7.6%
EFAX vs FEDM Performance
+43.9%+44.1%
- EFAX 0.20%
- FEDM 0.12%, better
- EFAX $487M
- FEDM $86M
- EFAX +10.3%
- FEDM +15.7%, better
- EFAX 3.21%, better
- FEDM 2.88%
- EFAX 639
- FEDM 231
- EFAX 18.7K sh, better
- FEDM 2.03K sh
- EFAX $53.53
- FEDM $64.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAX | FEDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | B56Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A75Higher | C40 |
Rank among International ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EFAX and FEDM are both graded against the same 18 International ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAXA
FEDMA
In short
EFAX Most ESG funds rebuild the developed-market index around ratings. EFAX makes one cut: companies that own fossil fuel reserves are out. The rest of the EAFE lineup stays put.
FEDM Northern Trust writes the index and runs the fund: a developed-ex-US core holding screened on its own ESG and climate scoring, at 0.12% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
EFAX The fund seeks to provide returns generally corresponding to the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index before fees and expenses. The index screens the developed-market MSCI EAFE universe to exclude companies with specified fossil-fuel reserves.
FEDM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAX vs FEDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAX vs FEDM Cost
Overpaying EFAX vs FEDM
$1,635
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAX 0.20%
$4,155
FEDM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAX | FEDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $220 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $859 | $562 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $2,520 | $1,635 |
- 0.20%EFAX
- 0.12%FEDM, cheaper
- Middle half of International ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.23%
FEDM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
EFAX 6th cheapest of 18 funds
EFAX vs FEDM Dividends
- EFAX 3.21%, better
- FEDM 2.88%
- EFAX $1.71
- FEDM $1.86
- EFAX $0.80
- FEDM $0.26
- EFAX Jun 1, 2026
- FEDM Sep 18, 2026
- EFAX Jun 5, 2026
- FEDM Sep 24, 2026
- EFAX Twice a year
- FEDM Quarterly
Distribution history
EFAX vs FEDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFAX
- FEDM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAX 12.3%FEDM 11.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAX 1.12FEDM 1.14, better
- Worst fall
- EFAX −31.2%FEDM −29.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFAX 0.98FEDM 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.