UFEB ranks 1st and DNOV 6th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
DNOV vs UFEB
0.0%by weight
UFEB −0.06pt a year
0.85%0.79%
UFEB 3.4×the volume
9.71K32.8K
DNOV +1.4pt
+8.6%+7.2%
DNOV vs UFEB Performance
+50.8%+41.8%
- DNOV 0.85%
- UFEB 0.79%, better
- DNOV $410M
- UFEB $167M
- DNOV +11.4%, better
- UFEB +9.4%
- DNOV 3
- UFEB 3
- DNOV 9.71K sh
- UFEB 32.8K sh, better
- DNOV $52.89
- UFEB $39.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DNOV | UFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | B67Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | A77Higher | C45 |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. DNOV and UFEB are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DNOVC
UFEBB
In short
DNOV A deep-buffer take on the S&P 500: you absorb the first 5% of a drop, the fund's design targets the next 25 points of losses, and your upside is capped for the year. The terms reset every November.
Stated mandate
DNOV The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 12.93% upside cap, while buffering Underlying ETF losses between -5% and -30% during the November 24, 2025–November 20, 2026 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DNOV vs UFEB Holdings
How DNOV and UFEB differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DNOV and 0.0% of UFEB.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in DNOVMore in UFEB | DNOV | UFEB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DNOVMore in UFEB | DNOV | UFEB |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DNOV102.9%
- UFEB102.7%
- DNOV2
- UFEB3
Asset class
- DNOV
- Multi-Asset
- UFEB
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DNOV2
- In both0
- Only in UFEB3
Only in DNOV
2 securities, 100% of DNOV by weight
- 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.58102.46%
- 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 626.080.08%
Only in UFEB
3 securities, 100% of UFEB by weight
- Spy 01/29/2027 6.89 C101.63%
- Spy 01/29/2027 657.37 P0.72%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.32%
Weight gaps
DNOV and UFEB share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DNOV vs UFEB Cost
Overpaying DNOV vs UFEB
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DNOV 0.85%
$16,199
UFEB 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DNOV | UFEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,405 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,331 | $375 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $15,174 | $1,025 |
- 0.85%DNOV
- 0.79%UFEB, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
UFEB 7th cheapest of 19 funds
DNOV 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DNOV vs UFEB Dividends
- DNOV None
- UFEB None
Distribution history
DNOV vs UFEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DNOV
- UFEB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DNOV 6.9%UFEB 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DNOV 1.44, betterUFEB 1.43
- Worst fall
- DNOV −10.0%UFEB −9.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DNOV 0.55UFEB 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.