Skip to content

DFEB vs DNOV

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DFEBCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November

DNOVCCboe

Overlap

0.3%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

DFEB0.85%DNOV0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

DFEB 1.4×the volume

DFEB13.6KDNOV9.71K

5Y return · a year

DNOV +0.5pt

DFEB+8.1%DNOV+8.6%

DFEB vs DNOV Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+47.4%DFEB+50.8%DNOV

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. DFEB +47.4%. DNOV +50.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%30%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DFEB 0.85%
DNOV 0.85%
Fund size
DFEB $456M
DNOV $410M
1Y total return
DFEB +9.9%
DNOV +11.4%, better
Holdings
DFEB 3
DNOV 3
Avg volume (30D)
DFEB 13.6K sh, better
DNOV 9.71K sh
NAV per share
DFEB $51.65
DNOV $52.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFEB: Cost 31, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 63, Durability 74. DNOV: Cost 31, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 69, Holdings 55, Durability 77.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFEB, DNOV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFEBDNOV
Cost30% weightD31D31
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherB61
Tradability15% weightA77HigherB69
Holdings10% weightB63HigherB55
Durability5% weightA74A77Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFEB and DNOV are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

DFEB ranks 4th and DNOV 6th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 4CPSCWPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 6CDJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 50
  7. Rank 6CDNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 50
  8. Rank 6CPSCJPacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFEBCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DNOVCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November

In short

DFEB A buffer with a deductible. DFEB lets the first 5% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust land on you, then covers the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets every February.

DNOV A deep-buffer take on the S&P 500: you absorb the first 5% of a drop, the fund's design targets the next 25 points of losses, and your upside is capped for the year. The terms reset every November.

Stated mandate

DFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.87% upside cap, while protecting against Underlying ETF losses from -5% through -30% during the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.

DNOV The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 12.93% upside cap, while buffering Underlying ETF losses between -5% and -30% during the November 24, 2025–November 20, 2026 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • DFEB Deep coverage where it hurts: the fund targets protection against reference-ETF losses from -5% through -30%, a 25-point band, over each one-year outcome period.
  • One of twelve monthly vintages on the same reference ETF (DMAR, DJUN, DDEC and the rest), so entries can be laddered across the calendar instead of hinging on one start date.
  • Running since 2020, it has rolled through several full outcome periods, and it sits in the upper half of its deep-buffer peer group.
  • At 0.85%, the fee sits right at the median for deep-buffer funds tracking this kind of strategy.
  • DNOV Deep buffer, not the entry-level kind: the design targets absorbing reference-fund losses from -5% down to -30% over each one-year outcome period, a 25-point band of cushion.ftportfolios.com
  • One of twelve monthly siblings (DFEB, DMAR, DJUN and the rest), so entry dates can be laddered across the calendar instead of hinging on a single November start.
  • Live since 2019 and through multiple full outcome periods, with a 0.85% fee that sits right at the median for deep-buffer funds.
  • A multi-hundred-million-dollar fund from First Trust, one of the more established names running defined-outcome strategies.

Worth knowing

  • DFEB The trade for depth: you absorb the first 5% of losses yourself, and gains stop at a cap that is reset each February from option pricing at the time.
  • It tracks price return only, so the reference ETF's dividends are not passed along, and the fund has not been paying distributions.
  • Cheaper deep-buffer options exist (PSCX and PSCW run 0.49%), and DFEB trades lightly, so limit orders are the sane way in and out.
  • DNOV The cap is the price of the cushion, and it resets each November. Buy mid-period and your actual cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms.ftportfolios.com
  • It references the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price return, so index dividends are outside the payoff, and the fund itself has not been making regular distributions.
  • The first 5% of losses and anything past -30% land on you. Shares trade lightly, so spreads matter, and cheaper deep-buffer options exist (PSCX, PSCW at 0.49%).

Full DFEB profile⁠

Full DNOV profile⁠

DFEB vs DNOV Holdings

How DFEB and DNOV differ

Overlap by weight

0.3%

Shared holdings make up 0.5% of DFEB and 0.3% of DNOV.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.3%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in DFEB and DNOV, widest gap first
SectorMore in DFEBMore in DNOV
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DFEB and DNOV, widest gap first
CountryMore in DFEBMore in DNOV
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DFEB103.2%
  • DNOV102.9%

Securities held

  • DFEB2
  • DNOV2

Asset class

DFEB
Multi-Asset
DNOV
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in DFEB2
  • In both0
  • Only in DNOV2

Only in DFEB

2 securities, 100% of DFEB by weight

  • 2027-02-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.88101.76%
  • 2027-02-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 654.960.87%

Only in DNOV

2 securities, 100% of DNOV by weight

  • 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.58102.46%
  • 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 626.080.08%

Weight gaps

DFEB and DNOV share no securities.

All 4 DFEB holdings⁠All 4 DNOV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFEB vs DNOV Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFEB 0.85%

    $16,199

  • DNOV 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFEB 0.85%
  • DNOV 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DFEB $16,199DNOV $16,199

Year by year

YearDFEBDNOV
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DFEB
  • 0.85%DNOV
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

DFEB 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DNOV 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DFEB vs DNOV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
DFEB None
DNOV None

Distribution history

DFEBAll DFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DNOVAll DNOV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DFEB vs DNOV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DFEB
  • DNOV
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: DNOV −10.0% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFEB 6.1%, betterDNOV 6.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFEB 1.57, betterDNOV 1.44
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFEB −10.0%DNOV −10.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFEB 0.50DNOV 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • DFEBCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DNOVCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DNOVCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DNOVCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.