DOG ranks 1st and DUST 29th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs DUST
0.0%by weight
DUST −0.01pt a year
0.95%0.94%
DOG 4.5×the volume
4.77M1.07M
DOG +41.9pt
−11.0%−52.9%
DOG vs DUST Performance
−20.6%−97.6%
- DOG 0.95%
- DUST 0.94%, better
- DOG $115M
- DUST $71M
- DOG −5.3%, better
- DUST −57.4%
- DOG 3.16%
- DUST 4.27%, better
- DOG 3
- DUST 5
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- DUST 1.07M sh
- DOG $22.02
- DUST $49.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | DUST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | B57 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and DUST are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
DUSTC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
DUST The gold-miner short, in one ticker. Running since 2010, DUST aims for 200% of the inverse of the daily move in global gold miners, then resets at the bell. Direxion dialed the target back from 3x to 2x in 2020.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
DUST The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. The issuer states that achieving this objective is not guaranteed.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs DUST Holdings
How DOG and DUST differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DOG and 0.0% of DUST.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for DUST.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for DUST.
Concentration
- DOG100.0%
- DUST194.4%
- DOG2
- DUST0
Asset class
- DOG
- Equity
- DUST
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in DOG2
- In both0
- Only in DUST0
Only in DOG
2 securities, 94.1% of DOG by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf89.61%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.45%
Only in DUST
0 securities, 0.0% of DUST by weight
Weight gaps
DOG and DUST share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs DUST Cost
Overpaying DOG vs DUST
$165
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
DUST 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | DUST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,661 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,260 | $62 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,704 | $165 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.94%DUST, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DUST 5th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs DUST Dividends
- DOG 3.16%
- DUST 4.27%, better
- DOG $0.69
- DUST $2.02
- DOG $0.17
- DUST $0.28
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- DUST Sep 22, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- DUST Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- DUST Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs DUST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- DUST
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterDUST 72.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21DUST −1.10, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterDUST −99.0%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83DUST −0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.