QQQD ranks 21st and DUST 29th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DUST vs QQQD
0.0%by weight
QQQD −0.44pt a year
0.94%0.50%
DUST 15.7×the volume
1.07M68.1K
DUST vs QQQD Performance
−57.4%0.0%
- DUST 0.94%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- DUST $71M
- QQQD $28M
- DUST −57.4%
- QQQD 0.0%, better
- DUST 4.27%, better
- QQQD 3.32%
- DUST 5
- QQQD 3
- DUST 1.07M sh, better
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- DUST $49.99
- QQQD $12.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DUST | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F19 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | C53Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B57Higher | D38 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DUST and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DUSTC
QQQDC
In short
DUST The gold-miner short, in one ticker. Running since 2010, DUST aims for 200% of the inverse of the daily move in global gold miners, then resets at the bell. Direxion dialed the target back from 3x to 2x in 2020.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
DUST The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. The issuer states that achieving this objective is not guaranteed.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DUST vs QQQD Holdings
How DUST and QQQD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DUST and 0.0% of QQQD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for DUST and QQQD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for DUST.
Concentration
- DUST194.4%
- QQQD3985.4%
- DUST0
- QQQD0
Asset class
- DUST
- Leveraged/Inverse
- QQQD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in DUST0
- In both0
- Only in QQQD0
Only in DUST
0 securities, 0.0% of DUST by weight
Only in QQQD
0 securities, 0.0% of QQQD by weight
Weight gaps
DUST and QQQD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DUST vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying DUST vs QQQD
$7,725
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DUST 0.94%
$17,704
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DUST | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $900 | $761 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $3,460 | $2,800 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $9,979 | $7,725 |
- 0.94%DUST
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
DUST 5th cheapest of 53 funds
DUST vs QQQD Dividends
- DUST 4.27%, better
- QQQD 3.32%
- DUST $2.02
- QQQD $0.41
- DUST $0.28
- QQQD $0.10
- DUST Sep 22, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- DUST Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- DUST Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
DUST vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DUST 72.7%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DUST −1.10QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- DUST −99.0%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DUST −0.86QQQD −1.35
DUST and QQQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
