DOG ranks 1st and EEV 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs EEV
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 157.6×the volume
4.77M30.3K
DOG +10.4pt
−11.0%−21.4%
DOG vs EEV Performance
−20.6%−57.0%
- DOG 0.95%
- EEV 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- EEV $3M
- DOG −5.3%, better
- EEV −29.5%
- DOG 3.16%
- EEV 6.29%, better
- DOG 3
- EEV 2
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- EEV 30.3K sh
- DOG $22.02
- EEV $12.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | EEV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | C43 | B55Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | C41 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and EEV are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
EEVC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
EEV The only -2x play on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index in a single ticker, running since 2007. The target resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon instrument rather than a set-and-forget short.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
EEV The fund seeks before-fee and expense results equal to negative two times the daily performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs EEV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs EEV Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
EEV 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | EEV |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%EEV
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EEV 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs EEV Dividends
- DOG 3.16%
- EEV 6.29%, better
- DOG $0.69
- EEV $0.79
- DOG $0.17
- EEV $0.19
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- EEV Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- EEV Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- EEV Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs EEV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- EEV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterEEV 31.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21, betterEEV −1.31
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterEEV −82.0%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83EEV −1.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.