DOG ranks 1st and FXP 28th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs FXP
5.9%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 1266.2×the volume
4.77M3.77K
DOG +9.6pt
−10.9%−20.5%
DOG vs FXP Performance
−20.7%−63.6%
- DOG 0.95%
- FXP 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- FXP $6M
- DOG −4.9%
- FXP +35.5%, better
- DOG 3.15%, better
- FXP 2.19%
- DOG 3
- FXP 1
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- FXP 3.77K sh
- DOG $22.02
- FXP $23.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | FXP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | F16 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C49 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and FXP are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
FXPC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
FXP The only US ETF built to move two times the opposite of the FTSE China 50, the 50 largest Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong. Live since 2007, and it resets daily: a trading instrument, not a set-and-forget China short.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
FXP FXP seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the FTSE China 50 Index’s daily performance. It is intended to gain when that index declines and lose when it rises.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs FXP Holdings
How DOG and FXP differ
5.9%
Shared holdings make up 100% of FXP and 5.9% of DOG.
Level by level
- Holdings5.9%
Sector
No Sector split for FXP.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for FXP.
Concentration
- DOG100.0%
- FXP100.0%
- DOG2
- FXP0
Asset class
- DOG
- Equity
- FXP
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DOG2
- In both0
- Only in FXP0
Only in DOG
2 securities, 94.1% of DOG by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf89.61%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.45%
Only in FXP
0 securities, 0.0% of FXP by weight
Weight gaps
DOG and FXP share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs FXP Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
FXP 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | FXP |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%FXP
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
FXP 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs FXP Dividends
- DOG 3.15%, better
- FXP 2.19%
- DOG $0.69
- FXP $0.51
- DOG $0.17
- FXP $0.12
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- FXP Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- FXP Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- FXP Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs FXP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- FXP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterFXP 40.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21FXP −0.77, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterFXP −88.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83FXP −0.61
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.