QQQD ranks 21st and FXP 28th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
FXP vs QQQD
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
QQQD 18.1×the volume
3.77K68.1K
FXP vs QQQD Performance
+35.5%−0.7%
- FXP 0.95%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- FXP $6M
- QQQD $28M
- FXP +35.5%, better
- QQQD −0.7%
- FXP 2.19%
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- FXP 1
- QQQD 3
- FXP 3.77K sh
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- FXP $23.15
- QQQD $12.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXP | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | F16 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49Higher | D38 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. FXP and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXPC
QQQDC
In short
FXP The only US ETF built to move two times the opposite of the FTSE China 50, the 50 largest Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong. Live since 2007, and it resets daily: a trading instrument, not a set-and-forget China short.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
FXP FXP seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the FTSE China 50 Index’s daily performance. It is intended to gain when that index declines and lose when it rises.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXP vs QQQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXP vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying FXP vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXP 0.95%
$17,869
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXP | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%FXP
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
FXP 6th cheapest of 53 funds
FXP vs QQQD Dividends
- FXP 2.19%
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- FXP $0.51
- QQQD $0.41
- FXP $0.12
- QQQD $0.10
- FXP Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- FXP Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- FXP Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
FXP vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXP 40.0%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FXP −0.77QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- FXP −88.3%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FXP −0.61QQQD −1.35
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
