DOG ranks 1st and MZZ 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs MZZ
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 606.3×the volume
4.77M7.87K
DOG +13.5pt
−10.9%−24.4%
DOG vs MZZ Performance
−20.7%−52.9%
- DOG 0.95%
- MZZ 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- MZZ $5M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- MZZ −20.3%
- DOG 3.15%
- MZZ 3.65%, better
- DOG 3
- MZZ 1
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- MZZ 7.87K sh
- DOG $22.02
- MZZ $6.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | MZZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C49 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and MZZ are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
MZZC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
MZZ A 2006-vintage bear trade on mid-cap America: MZZ aims to deliver two times the inverse of the S&P MidCap 400's daily move, one trading day at a time, while most inverse funds point at the big large-cap indexes.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
MZZ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the S&P MidCap 400's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs MZZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs MZZ Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
MZZ 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | MZZ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%MZZ
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
MZZ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs MZZ Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- MZZ 3.65%, better
- DOG $0.69
- MZZ $0.23
- DOG $0.17
- MZZ $0.03
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- MZZ Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- MZZ Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- MZZ Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs MZZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- MZZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterMZZ 29.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21MZZ −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterMZZ −71.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83MZZ −1.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.