QQQD ranks 21st and MZZ 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
MZZ vs QQQD
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
QQQD 8.7×the volume
7.87K68.1K
MZZ vs QQQD Performance
−20.3%−0.7%
- MZZ 0.95%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- MZZ $5M
- QQQD $28M
- MZZ −20.3%
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- MZZ 3.65%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- MZZ 1
- QQQD 3
- MZZ 7.87K sh
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- MZZ $6.43
- QQQD $12.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MZZ | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | F18 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49Higher | D38 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. MZZ and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MZZC
QQQDC
In short
MZZ A 2006-vintage bear trade on mid-cap America: MZZ aims to deliver two times the inverse of the S&P MidCap 400's daily move, one trading day at a time, while most inverse funds point at the big large-cap indexes.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
MZZ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the S&P MidCap 400's daily performance.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MZZ vs QQQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MZZ vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying MZZ vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MZZ 0.95%
$17,869
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MZZ | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%MZZ
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
MZZ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
MZZ vs QQQD Dividends
- MZZ 3.65%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- MZZ $0.23
- QQQD $0.41
- MZZ $0.03
- QQQD $0.10
- MZZ Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- MZZ Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- MZZ Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
MZZ vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MZZ 29.4%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MZZ −0.99QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- MZZ −71.2%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MZZ −1.98QQQD −1.35
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
