DOG ranks 1st and SMN 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs SMN
5.9%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 1670.7×the volume
4.77M2.86K
DOG +14.3pt
−10.9%−25.2%
DOG vs SMN Performance
−20.7%−57.8%
- DOG 0.95%
- SMN 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- SMN $4M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- SMN −35.6%
- DOG 3.15%
- SMN 3.21%, better
- DOG 3
- SMN 1
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- SMN 2.86K sh
- DOG $22.02
- SMN $18.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | SMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C45 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and SMN are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
SMNC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
SMN The only -2x ETF pointed at the S&P 500's materials sector: chemicals, miners and packagers, flipped and doubled, reset every single day. A trading tool that has been listed since 2007, not a set-and-forget hedge.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
SMN The fund targets daily, pre-expense performance equal to negative two times the S&P Materials Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs SMN Holdings
How DOG and SMN differ
5.9%
Shared holdings make up 100% of SMN and 5.9% of DOG.
Level by level
- Holdings5.9%
Sector
No Sector split for SMN.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SMN.
Concentration
- DOG100.0%
- SMN100.0%
- DOG2
- SMN0
Asset class
- DOG
- Equity
- SMN
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DOG2
- In both0
- Only in SMN0
Only in DOG
2 securities, 94.1% of DOG by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf89.61%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.45%
Only in SMN
0 securities, 0.0% of SMN by weight
Weight gaps
DOG and SMN share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs SMN Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
SMN 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | SMN |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%SMN
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SMN 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs SMN Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- SMN 3.21%, better
- DOG $0.69
- SMN $0.60
- DOG $0.17
- SMN $0.15
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- SMN Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- SMN Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- SMN Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs SMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- SMN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterSMN 33.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21SMN −0.65, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterSMN −66.8%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83SMN −1.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.