Skip to content

QQQD vs SMN

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X ETF

QQQDCNYSE Arca

ProShares UltraShort Materials

SMNCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QQQD −0.45pt a year

QQQD0.50%SMN0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

QQQD 23.9×the volume

QQQD68.1KSMN2.86K

QQQD vs SMN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.7%QQQD−35.6%SMN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. QQQD −0.7%. SMN −35.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%10%20%Oct 2025May 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QQQD 0.50%, better
SMN 0.95%
Fund size
QQQD $28M
SMN $4M
1Y total return
QQQD −0.7%, better
SMN −35.6%
Yield (12M)
QQQD 3.35%, better
SMN 3.21%
Holdings
QQQD 3
SMN 1
Avg volume (30D)
QQQD 68.1K sh, better
SMN 2.86K sh
NAV per share
QQQD $12.18
SMN $18.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QQQD: Cost 50, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 43, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. SMN: Cost 50, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 21, Holdings not scored, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for QQQD, SMN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQQQDSMN
Cost30% weightC50C50
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB67HigherC44
Tradability15% weightC43HigherF21
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD38C45Higher

Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QQQD and SMN are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 53 ›

QQQD ranks 21st and SMN 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 21CEFZProShares Short MSCI EAFEScore 51
  2. Rank 21CQQQDDirexion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X ETFScore 51
  3. Rank 23CZSLProShares UltraShort SilverScore 50
  4. Rank 32CSIJProShares UltraShort IndustrialsScore 40
  5. Rank 32CSMNProShares UltraShort MaterialsScore 40
  6. Rank 32CSZKProShares UltraShort Consumer StaplesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QQQDCDirexion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X ETF

SMNCProShares UltraShort Materials

In short

QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.

SMN The only -2x ETF pointed at the S&P 500's materials sector: chemicals, miners and packagers, flipped and doubled, reset every single day. A trading tool that has been listed since 2007, not a set-and-forget hedge.

Stated mandate

QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.

SMN The fund targets daily, pre-expense performance equal to negative two times the S&P Materials Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

  • QQQD One-for-one inverse, not 2x or 3x. A 1% index gain is designed to show up as roughly a 1% fund loss that day, and the reverse on down days, with no leverage stacked on top.direxion.com
  • 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027, below the category median and below the 0.95% at PSQ and DOG (net of waivers through September 30, 2027).
  • Surgical target: the short exposure is to the Magnificent 7 basket itself, not a broad Nasdaq index where those seven names get diluted by dozens of others.direxion.com
  • Despite launching in 2024, it stands in the upper half of a crowded bear and inverse peer group.
  • SMN ProShares bills it as the only -2x materials ETF, so geared inverse exposure to the S&P 500's chemical, mining and packaging names runs through this one ticker.proshares.com
  • 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027. That sits near the category median and level with ProShares stablemates PSQ and DOG, both 0.95% net under waivers to the same date.
  • Listed since January 2007, so the daily-reset machinery has run through nearly two decades of commodity cycles. Long life for a geared inverse fund.

Worth knowing

  • QQQD Exposure resets every day. Hold longer than a day and compounding means the result can drift from the simple inverse of the index's move over that stretch.direxion.com
  • Seven mega-caps drive everything. One earnings surprise or one AI headline can move the whole basket, with no other holdings to soften it.direxion.com
  • That 0.50% is a net figure. Gross expenses run 1.08%, so the cost picture shifts if the waiver is not extended past September 1, 2027.
  • SMN The -2x target applies to a single day. Hold longer and each day's return compounds, so the result can land well away from -2x the index's move over that stretch.proshares.com
  • A small fund and thinly traded, which can make the cost of getting in and out matter more than the expense ratio.
  • That 0.95% is a capped figure, not the raw cost: the gross ratio is 6.56%, with the waiver running through September 30, 2027.

Full QQQD profile⁠

Full SMN profile⁠

QQQD vs SMN Holdings

How QQQD and SMN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QQQD and 0.0% of SMN.

Level by level

  • Asset classLeveraged/Inverse, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for QQQD and SMN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for SMN.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QQQD5083.3%
  • SMN100.0%

Securities held

  • QQQD0
  • SMN0

Asset class

QQQD
Leveraged/Inverse
SMN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QQQD0
  • In both0
  • Only in SMN0

Only in QQQD

0 securities, 0.0% of QQQD by weight

Only in SMN

0 securities, 0.0% of SMN by weight

Weight gaps

QQQD and SMN share no securities.

All 7 QQQD holdings⁠All 7 SMN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QQQD vs SMN Cost

Overpaying SMN vs QQQD

$7,890

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QQQD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • SMN 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QQQD 0.50%
  • SMN 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SMN $17,869QQQD $9,979

Year by year

YearQQQDSMNOverpaying
10$900$1,678$778
20$3,460$6,322$2,862
30$9,979$17,869$7,890

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
  • 0.95%SMN
  • Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

QQQD cheapest of 53 funds

SMN 6th cheapest of 53 funds

QQQD vs SMN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QQQD 3.35%, better
SMN 3.21%
Payout (12M)
QQQD $0.41
SMN $0.60
Last payment
QQQD $0.10
SMN $0.15
Ex-dividend
QQQD Sep 22, 2026
SMN Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
QQQD Sep 29, 2026
SMN Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
QQQD Quarterly
SMN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QQQDQuarterly · 10 paymentsAll QQQD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2024 $0.32; Sep 24, 2024 $0.41; Dec 23, 2024 $0.15; Mar 25, 2025 $0.13; Jun 24, 2025 $0.20; Sep 23, 2025 $0.08; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Mar 24, 2026 $0.08; Jun 23, 2026 $0.09; Sep 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SMNQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll SMN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2018 $0.17; Mar 20, 2019 $0.29; Jun 25, 2019 $0.37; Sep 25, 2019 $0.51; Dec 24, 2019 $0.16; Dec 22, 2022 $0.18; Mar 22, 2023 $0.24; Jun 21, 2023 $0.33; Sep 20, 2023 $0.38; Dec 20, 2023 $0.53; Mar 20, 2024 $0.32; Jun 26, 2024 $0.34; Sep 25, 2024 $0.38; Dec 23, 2024 $0.63; Mar 26, 2025 $0.20; Jun 25, 2025 $0.31; Sep 24, 2025 $0.27; Dec 24, 2025 $0.28; Mar 25, 2026 $0.05; Jun 24, 2026 $0.12; Sep 23, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

QQQD vs SMN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QQQD 21.1%since Apr 2024SMN 33.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QQQD −1.14since Apr 2024SMN −0.65
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QQQD −51.4%since Mar 2024SMN −66.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QQQD −1.35SMN −1.36

QQQD and SMN in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QQQDCvsDOGB

    Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X ETF · ProShares Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMNCvsDOGB

    ProShares UltraShort Materials · ProShares Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQQDCvsSVXYB

    Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X ETF · ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMNCvsSVXYB

    ProShares UltraShort Materials · ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQQDCvsPSQB

    Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X ETF · ProShares Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMNCvsPSQB

    ProShares UltraShort Materials · ProShares Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.