DOG ranks 1st and SSG 27th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs SSG
82.4%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 6.5×the volume
5.25M813K
DOG +48.8pt
−10.8%−59.6%
DOG vs SSG Performance
−20.6%−99.1%
- DOG 0.95%
- SSG 0.95%
- DOG $123M
- SSG $50M
- DOG −7.4%, better
- SSG −49.6%
- DOG 3.19%
- SSG 5.65%, better
- DOG 3
- SSG 2
- DOG 5.25M sh, better
- SSG 813K sh
- DOG $22.21
- SSG $16.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A70Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C44 | C44 |
| Durability | B68Higher | B63 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and SSG are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
SSGC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
SSG Chip stocks cut both ways. SSG is ProShares' -2x daily short on the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index, built one trading day at a time and live since 2007. Fee: 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.33% gross).
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
SSG The fund targets daily, pre-fee and pre-expense returns that are twice the opposite of the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors SM Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs SSG Holdings
How DOG and SSG differ
82.4%
Shared holdings make up 84.3% of SSG and 82.4% of DOG.
About this figure: DOG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
SSG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings82.4%
Sector
| Sector | More in DOGMore in SSG | Gap | DOG | SSG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DOGMore in SSG | Gap | DOG | SSG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- DOG100.0%
- SSG100.0%
- DOG2
- SSG1
Asset class
- DOG
- Stocks
- SSG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in DOG1
- In both1
- Only in SSG0
Only in DOG
1 security, 4.1% of DOG by weight
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.10%
Only in SSG
0 securities, 0.0% of SSG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in DOGMore in SSG | Gap | DOG | SSG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf | SSG +1.98 points | 82.35% | 84.33% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs SSG Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
SSG 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%SSG
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SSG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs SSG Dividends
- DOG 3.19%
- SSG 5.65%, better
- DOG $0.69
- SSG $0.89
- DOG $0.17
- SSG $0.14
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- SSG Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- SSG Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- SSG Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs SSG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- SSG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterSSG 56.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21, betterSSG −2.03
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterSSG −99.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83SSG −3.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.