QQQD ranks 20th and SSG 27th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs SSG
0.0%by weight
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
SSG 12.3×the volume
65.9K813K
QQQD vs SSG Performance
−5.0%−49.6%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- SSG 0.95%
- QQQD $27M
- SSG $50M
- QQQD −5.0%, better
- SSG −49.6%
- QQQD 3.38%
- SSG 5.65%, better
- QQQD 4
- SSG 2
- QQQD 65.9K sh
- SSG 813K sh, better
- QQQD $12.56
- SSG $16.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | C43 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | |
| Durability | D39 | B63Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and SSG are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
SSGC
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
SSG Chip stocks cut both ways. SSG is ProShares' -2x daily short on the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index, built one trading day at a time and live since 2007. Fee: 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.33% gross).
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
SSG The fund targets daily, pre-fee and pre-expense returns that are twice the opposite of the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors SM Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs SSG Holdings
How QQQD and SSG differ
0.0%
About this figure: QQQD gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
SSG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for QQQD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QQQDMore in SSG | Gap | QQQD | SSG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- QQQD28376.9%
- SSG100.0%
- QQQD2
- SSG1
Asset class
- QQQD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- SSG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in QQQD2
- In both0
- Only in SSG1
Only in QQQD
2 securities, 100% of QQQD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5063784.38%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut2607.32%
Only in SSG
1 security, 84.3% of SSG by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf84.33%
Weight gaps
QQQD and SSG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs SSG Cost
Overpaying SSG vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
SSG 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | SSG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%SSG
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
SSG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs SSG Dividends
- QQQD 3.38%
- SSG 5.65%, better
- QQQD $0.41
- SSG $0.89
- QQQD $0.10
- SSG $0.14
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- SSG Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- SSG Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- SSG Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs SSG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%SSG 56.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14SSG −2.03
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%SSG −99.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.38SSG −3.47
QQQD and SSG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
