DOG ranks 1st and ZVOL 13th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs ZVOL
DOG −0.47pt a year
0.95%1.42%
DOG 69.0×the volume
5.25M76.1K
ZVOL +17.0pt
−9.6%+7.4%
DOG vs ZVOL Performance
−7.4%+23.4%
- DOG 0.95%, better
- ZVOL 1.42%
- DOG $123M
- ZVOL $21M
- DOG −7.4%
- ZVOL +23.4%, better
- DOG 3.19%
- ZVOL 82.91%, better
- DOG 3
- ZVOL 1
- DOG 5.25M sh, better
- ZVOL 76.1K sh
- DOG $22.21
- ZVOL $6.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | ZVOL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A70 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A93Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | C44 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | C48 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and ZVOL are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
ZVOLB
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
ZVOL Short volatility, but further out the curve. ZVOL takes daily inverse exposure to mid-term VIX futures instead of the front month, aiming to monetize the roll premium in those contracts, and it pays out monthly.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
ZVOL The Fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Inverse Daily Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs ZVOL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs ZVOL Cost
Overpaying ZVOL vs DOG
$7,268
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
ZVOL 1.42%
$25,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | ZVOL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $2,460 | $782 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $9,074 | $2,752 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $25,137 | $7,268 |
- 0.95%DOG, cheaper
- 1.42%ZVOL
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
ZVOL 52nd cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs ZVOL Dividends
- DOG 3.19%
- ZVOL 82.91%, better
- DOG $0.69
- ZVOL $5.82
- DOG $0.17
- ZVOL $0.49
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- ZVOL Oct 21, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- ZVOL Oct 22, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- ZVOL Monthly
Distribution history
DOG vs ZVOL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterZVOL 21.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21ZVOL 0.37, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%ZVOL −37.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83ZVOL 1.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.