DUG ranks 2nd and DRIP 5th of 5 funds in the Inverse Energy Category.
DRIP vs DUG
DUG −0.06pt a year
1.01%0.95%
DRIP 6.2×the volume
1.13M182K
DUG +9.2pt
−43.6%−34.4%
DRIP vs DUG Performance
−93.2%−92.3%
- DRIP 1.01%
- DUG 0.95%, better
- DRIP $141M
- DUG $31M
- DRIP −67.8%
- DUG −64.4%, better
- DRIP 4.27%
- DUG 5.10%, better
- DRIP 5
- DUG 1
- DRIP 1.13M sh, better
- DUG 182K sh
- DRIP $30.11
- DUG $11.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DRIP | DUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | B65Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | C48Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | C52Higher | C43 |
Rank among Inverse Energy funds
Same Category. DRIP and DUG are both graded against the same 5 Inverse Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DRIPD
DUGB
In short
DRIP A 2x inverse bet on the shale drillers, not the barrel. DRIP aims for 200% of the daily inverse move of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, a modified equal-weight basket of US E&P stocks, and resets that leverage every day.
DUG The inverse energy trade in stock form: DUG targets -2x the daily move of the S&P 500's energy sector, not barrels of crude. Trading since 2007, it is one of the old hands in a small corner of the market.
Stated mandate
DRIP The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
DUG The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the daily performance of the S&P Energy Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DRIP vs DUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DRIP vs DUG Cost
Overpaying DRIP vs DUG
$981
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DRIP 1.01%
$18,850
DUG 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DRIP | DUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $6,322 | $364 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $17,869 | $981 |
- 1.01%DRIP
- 0.95%DUG, cheaper
- Middle half of Inverse Energy funds
- Median 0.95%
DUG cheapest of 5 funds
DRIP 5th cheapest of 5 funds
DRIP vs DUG Dividends
- DRIP 4.27%
- DUG 5.10%, better
- DRIP $1.23
- DUG $0.61
- DRIP $0.27
- DUG $0.08
- DRIP Sep 22, 2026
- DUG Sep 23, 2026
- DRIP Sep 29, 2026
- DUG Sep 29, 2026
- DRIP Quarterly
- DUG Quarterly
Distribution history
DRIP vs DUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DRIP
- DUG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DRIP 46.0%DUG 38.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DRIP −0.70, betterDUG −0.97
- Worst fall
- DRIP −94.6%DUG −93.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DRIP −0.08DUG −0.03
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.