SCO ranks 1st and DRIP 5th of 5 funds in the Inverse Energy Category.
DRIP vs SCO
SCO −0.06pt a year
1.01%0.95%
SCO 4.6×the volume
1.13M5.23M
SCO +2.0pt
−43.6%−41.6%
DRIP vs SCO Performance
−93.2%−94.0%
- DRIP 1.01%
- SCO 0.95%, better
- DRIP $141M
- SCO $841M
- DRIP −67.8%, better
- SCO −78.3%
- DRIP 4.27%
- SCO
- DRIP 5
- SCO 1
- DRIP 1.13M sh
- SCO 5.23M sh, better
- DRIP $30.11
- SCO $15.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DRIP | SCO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | B65Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | D36 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C52 | B67Higher |
Rank among Inverse Energy funds
Same Category. DRIP and SCO are both graded against the same 5 Inverse Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DRIPD
SCOB
In short
DRIP A 2x inverse bet on the shale drillers, not the barrel. DRIP aims for 200% of the daily inverse move of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, a modified equal-weight basket of US E&P stocks, and resets that leverage every day.
SCO A 2008-vintage double-short on crude: built to deliver -2x the daily move of a balanced WTI crude oil index. Cheaper than most bear-energy rivals, heavily traded, and it resets every day.
Stated mandate
DRIP The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
SCO SCO seeks daily pre-fee results corresponding to negative two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DRIP vs SCO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DRIP vs SCO Cost
Overpaying DRIP vs SCO
$981
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DRIP 1.01%
$18,850
SCO 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DRIP | SCO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $6,322 | $364 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $17,869 | $981 |
- 1.01%DRIP
- 0.95%SCO, cheaper
- Middle half of Inverse Energy funds
- Median 0.95%
SCO cheapest of 5 funds
DRIP 5th cheapest of 5 funds
DRIP vs SCO Dividends
- DRIP 4.27%
- SCO
- DRIP $1.23
- SCO None
- DRIP $0.27
- SCO
- DRIP Sep 22, 2026
- SCO
- DRIP Sep 29, 2026
- SCO
- DRIP Quarterly
- SCO
Distribution history
DRIP vs SCO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DRIP
- SCO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DRIP 46.0%, betterSCO 49.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- DRIP −0.70, betterSCO −0.84
- Worst fall
- DRIP −94.6%, betterSCO −95.5%
- Market sensitivity
- DRIP −0.08SCO −2.47
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.