GINC ranks 3rd and DUKZ 19th of 23 funds in the Multi-Sector Bond Income Category.
DUKZ vs GINC
GINC −0.62pt a year
1.02%0.40%
GINC 3.5×the volume
15K52.1K
DUKZ vs GINC Performance
+0.9%+0.9%
- DUKZ 1.02%
- GINC 0.40%, better
- DUKZ $60M
- GINC $212M
- DUKZ +1.2%
- GINC
- DUKZ 3.92%
- GINC
- DUKZ 10
- GINC 493
- DUKZ 15K sh
- GINC 52.1K sh, better
- DUKZ $24.80
- GINC $48.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DUKZ | GINC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A81Higher |
| Mission | B56 | |
| Risk | D35 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A78Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A80Higher |
Rank among Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
Same Category. DUKZ and GINC are both graded against the same 23 Multi-Sector Bond Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DUKZD
GINCA
In short
DUKZ Most allocation ETFs stay fully invested and hope you have the stomach for it. DUKZ, launched in 2024, is built to move: it rotates among higher-yielding ETFs, long-term Treasuries, and cash equivalents as risk shifts.
Stated mandate
DUKZ The Fund seeks total return while limiting exposure to downside risk. It tactically allocates among higher-yielding ETFs, long-term Treasury ETFs, and cash equivalents.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DUKZ vs GINC Holdings
How DUKZ and GINC differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country78.2%
Sector
No Sector split for DUKZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DUKZMore in GINC | Gap | DUKZ | GINC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | DUKZ +21.8 points | 100.0% | 78.2% | |
| Cayman Islands | GINC +11.6 points | 0.0% | 11.6% | |
| United Kingdom | GINC +3.2 points | 0.0% | 3.2% | |
| Mexico | GINC +1.6 points | 0.0% | 1.6% | |
| Canada | GINC +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% | |
| Australia | GINC +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% | |
| Switzerland | GINC +0.8 points | 0.0% | 0.8% | |
| Argentina | GINC +0.8 points | 0.0% | 0.8% | |
| Other countries (7) | GINC +2.1 points | 0.0% | 2.1% |
Outside the US: GINC 36% developed, 64% emerging.
Concentration
- DUKZ100.4%
- GINC24.7%
- DUKZ9
- GINC488
Asset class
- DUKZ
- Bonds
- GINC
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. DUKZ holds 9 securities, GINC 488.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DUKZ vs GINC Cost
Overpaying DUKZ vs GINC
$10,922
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DUKZ 1.02%
$19,012
GINC 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DUKZ | GINC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $723 | $1,074 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $2,793 | $3,953 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $8,090 | $10,922 |
- 1.02%DUKZ
- 0.40%GINC, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
- Median 0.60%
GINC 5th cheapest of 23 funds
DUKZ 20th cheapest of 23 funds
DUKZ vs GINC Dividends
- DUKZ 3.92%
- GINC
- DUKZ $0.97
- GINC
- DUKZ $0.09
- GINC $0.25
- DUKZ Nov 5, 2026
- GINC Nov 2, 2026
- DUKZ Pays Nov 10, 2026
- GINC Nov 6, 2026
- DUKZ Monthly
- GINC Monthly
Distribution history
DUKZ vs GINC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DUKZ 4.5%GINC
- Return per unit of risk
- DUKZ −0.23GINC
- Worst fall
- DUKZ −4.7%GINC
- Market sensitivity
- DUKZ 0.30GINC 0.67
DUKZ and GINC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
