PANG ranks 3rd and DUOG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
DUOG vs PANG
7.7%by weight
DUOG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
PANG 6.6×the volume
6.72K44.6K
DUOG vs PANG Performance
−63.5%+183.4%
- DUOG 0.75%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- DUOG $2M
- PANG $9M
- DUOG
- PANG +91.6%
- DUOG 5
- PANG 4
- DUOG 6.72K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- DUOG $42.67
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DUOG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A85 | A94Higher |
| Risk | C42 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C44 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. DUOG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DUOGC
PANGA
In short
DUOG One ticker, double the daily move in Duolingo. DUOG aims for 2x DUOL's daily performance before fees, at 0.75% a year, and it resets that target every day, which makes it a short-horizon tool rather than a hold-forever one.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
DUOG The fund seeks two times the daily performance of Duolingo, Inc. common stock, before fees and expenses, through daily leveraged exposure.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DUOG vs PANG Holdings
How DUOG and PANG differ
7.7%
Shared holdings make up 8.4% of PANG and 7.7% of DUOG.
Level by level
- Holdings7.7%
Sector
No Sector split for DUOG and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DUOGMore in PANG | DUOG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- DUOG207.7%
- PANG208.4%
- DUOG1
- PANG1
Asset class
- DUOG
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DUOG0
- In both1
- Only in PANG0
Only in DUOG
0 securities, 0.0% of DUOG by weight
Only in PANG
0 securities, 0.0% of PANG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in DUOGMore in PANG | DUOG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | PANG +0.73 points | 7.70% | 8.43% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DUOG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs DUOG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DUOG 0.75%
$14,482
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DUOG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%DUOG, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
DUOG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
DUOG vs PANG Dividends
- DUOG None
- PANG
- DUOG
- PANG $1.30
- DUOG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- DUOG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- DUOG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
DUOG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DUOG PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- DUOG PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- DUOG PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DUOG 2.11PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.