DYNF ranks 4th and LCTU 6th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DYNF vs LCTU
LCTU −0.11pt a year
0.26%0.15%
DYNF 30.8×the volume
2.25M73.2K
DYNF +3.3pt
+13.8%+10.5%
DYNF vs LCTU Performance
+90.9%+64.5%
- DYNF 0.26%
- LCTU 0.15%, better
- DYNF $41.8B
- LCTU $1.16B
- DYNF +11.6%, better
- LCTU +9.8%
- DYNF 0.84%
- LCTU 0.97%, better
- DYNF 264
- LCTU 323
- DYNF 2.25M sh, better
- LCTU 73.2K sh
- DYNF $67.32
- LCTU $80.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DYNF | LCTU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A99Higher | A85 |
| Holdings | B65 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A97Higher | A86 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DYNF and LCTU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DYNFA
LCTUA
In short
DYNF Most factor funds make you pick a lane: value, momentum, quality. DYNF rotates across five styles instead, letting a factor model decide which one leads, and charges an index-fund-ish 0.26% to do it.
LCTU BlackRock's climate pick: an active Russell 1000 portfolio tilted toward companies it scores as transition-ready, at 0.15% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027. Launched in 2021 with the biggest first-day haul the ETF industry had seen.
Stated mandate
DYNF The Fund seeks to outperform the U.S. equity market through diversified, tactical exposure to style factors using a factor rotation model.
LCTU LCTU pursues long-term capital growth through U.S. large- and mid-cap equities that BlackRock judges more capable of benefiting from the shift toward a low-carbon economy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DYNF vs LCTU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DYNF vs LCTU Cost
Overpaying DYNF vs LCTU
$2,221
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DYNF 0.26%
$5,358
LCTU 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DYNF | LCTU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $274 | $199 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $1,071 | $767 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $3,137 | $2,221 |
- 0.26%DYNF
- 0.15%LCTU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
LCTU 6th cheapest of 121 funds
DYNF 18th cheapest of 121 funds
DYNF vs LCTU Dividends
- DYNF 0.84%
- LCTU 0.97%, better
- DYNF $0.56
- LCTU $0.79
- DYNF $0.14
- LCTU $0.20
- DYNF Sep 15, 2026
- LCTU Sep 15, 2026
- DYNF Sep 18, 2026
- LCTU Sep 18, 2026
- DYNF Quarterly
- LCTU Quarterly
Distribution history
DYNF vs LCTU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DYNF
- LCTU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DYNF 13.1%LCTU 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DYNF 1.55, betterLCTU 1.33
- Worst fall
- DYNF −26.9%LCTU −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DYNF 1.02LCTU 1.01
DYNF and LCTU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
