IEFA ranks 4th and EFA 10th of 20 funds in the Developed International Core Category.
EFA vs IEFA
IEFA −0.25pt a year
0.32%0.07%
EFA 1.3×the volume
11.9M8.85M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+9.2%+9.2%
EFA vs IEFA Performance
+50.5%+48.4%
- EFA 0.32%
- IEFA 0.07%, better
- EFA $76.6B
- IEFA $189B
- EFA +13.1%
- IEFA +13.3%, better
- EFA 3.25%
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- EFA 673
- IEFA 2638
- EFA 11.9M sh, better
- IEFA 8.85M sh
- EFA $103.23
- IEFA $96.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFA | IEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44 | C44 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | B68 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A85Higher |
Rank among Developed International Core funds
Same Category. EFA and IEFA are both graded against the same 20 Developed International Core funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAB
IEFAA
In short
EFA The 2001 original: one ticker for roughly 700 large and mid caps in developed markets outside the US and Canada. Newer clones undercut it badly on fee, but few trade as heavily.
IEFA Developed markets outside the US and Canada, right down to the small caps: roughly 2,600 stocks for 0.07% a year. The category's workhorse, and one of the biggest, most heavily traded funds on the shelf.
Stated mandate
EFA The fund seeks to track large- and mid-capitalization developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada, providing broad international developed-market exposure.
IEFA The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid- and small-capitalization developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFA vs IEFA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFA vs IEFA Cost
Overpaying EFA vs IEFA
$5,062
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFA 0.32%
$6,542
IEFA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFA | IEFA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $128 | $452 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $503 | $1,747 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $1,480 | $5,062 |
- 0.32%EFA
- 0.07%IEFA, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Core funds
- Median 0.10%
IEFA 7th cheapest of 20 funds
EFA 17th cheapest of 20 funds
EFA vs IEFA Dividends
- EFA 3.25%
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- EFA $3.36
- IEFA $3.29
- EFA $1.64
- IEFA $1.58
- EFA Jun 15, 2026
- IEFA Jun 15, 2026
- EFA Jun 18, 2026
- IEFA Jun 18, 2026
- EFA Twice a year
- IEFA Twice a year
Distribution history
EFA vs IEFA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFA
- IEFA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFA 11.7%, betterIEFA 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFA 1.20IEFA 1.20Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- EFA −29.2%, betterIEFA −30.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EFA 0.78IEFA 0.89
EFA and IEFA in the news





Filings Digest
AllianzIM launches OCTI and resets October buffer terms

Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.