IGRO ranks 4th and EFAS 19th of 34 funds in the International Dividend Index Category.
EFAS vs IGRO
IGRO −0.40pt a year
0.55%0.15%
IGRO 2.3×the volume
17.8K41.5K
EFAS +5.0pt
+14.5%+9.5%
EFAS vs IGRO Performance
+96.8%+57.6%
- EFAS 0.55%
- IGRO 0.15%, better
- EFAS $61M
- IGRO $1.32B
- EFAS +28.4%, better
- IGRO +21.3%
- EFAS 4.89%, better
- IGRO 2.57%
- EFAS 56
- IGRO 576
- EFAS 17.8K sh
- IGRO 41.5K sh, better
- EFAS $22.20
- IGRO $91.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAS | IGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A72 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A81Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | C43 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | C52Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A70Higher |
Rank among International Dividend Index funds
Same Category. EFAS and IGRO are both graded against the same 34 International Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFASC
IGROA
In short
EFAS EFAS skips the broad income net: it takes the 50 highest-yielding stocks in developed Europe, Australasia and the Far East, weights them equally, and resets once a year. A yield-first, concentrated take on international income, paid monthly.
IGRO Dividend growth, not dividend yield, taken overseas. IGRO tracks a Morningstar index of non-US companies with a habit of raising their payouts, spread across roughly 500 names, for a fee that undercuts most of the international dividend shelf.
Stated mandate
EFAS EFAS seeks investment results that generally correspond to the performance of the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index before fees and expenses.
IGRO The fund seeks to track an index of international stocks with a history of growing dividends, providing dividend-focused international equity exposure for income and long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAS vs IGRO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAS vs IGRO Cost
Overpaying EFAS vs IGRO
$7,767
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAS 0.55%
$10,904
IGRO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAS | IGRO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $274 | $714 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $1,071 | $2,719 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $3,137 | $7,767 |
- 0.55%EFAS
- 0.15%IGRO, cheaper
- Middle half of International Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.49%
IGRO 6th cheapest of 34 funds
EFAS 22nd cheapest of 34 funds
EFAS vs IGRO Dividends
- EFAS 4.89%, better
- IGRO 2.57%
- EFAS $1.11
- IGRO $2.41
- EFAS $0.09
- IGRO $0.43
- EFAS Nov 4, 2026
- IGRO Sep 15, 2026
- EFAS Pays Nov 12, 2026
- IGRO Sep 18, 2026
- EFAS Monthly
- IGRO Quarterly
Distribution history
EFAS vs IGRO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFAS
- IGRO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAS 12.6%IGRO 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAS 1.67, betterIGRO 1.32
- Worst fall
- EFAS −28.8%IGRO −26.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFAS 0.68IGRO 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.