VSGX ranks 1st and EFAX 5th of 18 funds in the International ESG & Values Index Category.
EFAX vs VSGX
VSGX −0.10pt a year
0.20%0.10%
VSGX 8.9×the volume
18.7K166K
EFAX +0.2pt
+7.6%+7.4%
EFAX vs VSGX Performance
+43.9%+43.0%
- EFAX 0.20%
- VSGX 0.10%, better
- EFAX $487M
- VSGX $6.7B
- EFAX +10.3%
- VSGX +14.4%, better
- EFAX 3.21%, better
- VSGX 3.11%
- EFAX 639
- VSGX 6667
- EFAX 18.7K sh
- VSGX 166K sh, better
- EFAX $53.53
- VSGX $77.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAX | VSGX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A75 | A92Higher |
Rank among International ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EFAX and VSGX are both graded against the same 18 International ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAXA
VSGXA
In short
EFAX Most ESG funds rebuild the developed-market index around ratings. EFAX makes one cut: companies that own fossil fuel reserves are out. The rest of the EAFE lineup stays put.
VSGX Most ex-US ESG funds stop at big developed-market names. VSGX casts a wider net: large, mid and small caps across developed and emerging markets, minus the industries its index screens out, for 0.10% a year.
Stated mandate
EFAX The fund seeks to provide returns generally corresponding to the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index before fees and expenses. The index screens the developed-market MSCI EAFE universe to exclude companies with specified fossil-fuel reserves.
VSGX The Fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks from developed and emerging markets outside the United States, subject to environmental, social, and corporate-governance screening.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAX vs VSGX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAX vs VSGX Cost
Overpaying EFAX vs VSGX
$2,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAX 0.20%
$4,155
VSGX 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAX | VSGX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $183 | $182 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $717 | $704 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $2,106 | $2,049 |
- 0.20%EFAX
- 0.10%VSGX, cheaper
- Middle half of International ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.23%
VSGX cheapest of 18 funds
EFAX 6th cheapest of 18 funds
EFAX vs VSGX Dividends
- EFAX 3.21%, better
- VSGX 3.11%
- EFAX $1.71
- VSGX $2.43
- EFAX $0.80
- VSGX $0.47
- EFAX Jun 1, 2026
- VSGX Sep 18, 2026
- EFAX Jun 5, 2026
- VSGX Sep 22, 2026
- EFAX Twice a year
- VSGX Quarterly
Distribution history
EFAX vs VSGX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFAX
- VSGX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAX 12.3%, betterVSGX 12.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAX 1.12VSGX 1.20, better
- Worst fall
- EFAX −31.2%VSGX −31.2%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- EFAX 0.98VSGX 0.97
EFAX and VSGX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
