EFIV ranks 2nd and MNZL 43rd of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
EFIV vs MNZL
EFIV −0.30pt a year
0.10%0.40%
EFIV 9.3×the volume
59.9K6.45K
EFIV vs MNZL Performance
+9.6%+16.9%
- EFIV 0.10%, better
- MNZL 0.40%
- EFIV $1B
- MNZL $39M
- EFIV +12.9%
- MNZL
- EFIV 1.03%
- MNZL
- EFIV 326
- MNZL 483
- EFIV 59.9K sh, better
- MNZL 6.45K sh
- EFIV $70.67
- MNZL $60.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFIV | MNZL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | D26 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A78 |
| Risk | C51Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | C43Higher | D32 |
| Durability | B68Higher | F2 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EFIV and MNZL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFIVA
MNZLC
In short
EFIV A screened S&P 500 that still looks like one. EFIV trims to about 300 names on ESG criteria but holds industry-group weights close to the parent index, for 0.10% a year.
MNZL A broad slice of the US market, filtered for faith. MNZL passively tracks a Russell index that screens stocks for Shariah compliance, then adds a second AFSC layer. Ordinary index plumbing, faith-based rules on top. Launched 2025.
Stated mandate
EFIV The Fund seeks to track an index of securities selected using environmental, social, and governance sustainability criteria while retaining industry-group weights broadly similar to the S&P 500 Index.
MNZL The Fund uses passive indexing to track the total return performance of its Russell index before fees and expenses. The index consists of common stocks and applies Shariah screening followed by AFSC principles.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFIV vs MNZL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFIV vs MNZL Cost
Overpaying MNZL vs EFIV
$5,984
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFIV 0.10%
$2,106
MNZL 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFIV | MNZL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $723 | $540 |
| 20 | $717 | $2,793 | $2,076 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $8,090 | $5,984 |
- 0.10%EFIV, cheaper
- 0.40%MNZL
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
EFIV 7th cheapest of 47 funds
MNZL 35th cheapest of 47 funds
EFIV vs MNZL Dividends
- EFIV 1.03%
- MNZL
- EFIV $0.74
- MNZL
- EFIV $0.20
- MNZL $0.02
- EFIV Sep 21, 2026
- MNZL Dec 30, 2025
- EFIV Sep 23, 2026
- MNZL Dec 31, 2025
- EFIV Quarterly
- MNZL Irregular
Distribution history
EFIV vs MNZL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFIV 12.3%MNZL
- Return per unit of risk
- EFIV 1.39MNZL
- Worst fall
- EFIV −24.5%MNZL
- Market sensitivity
- EFIV 1.01MNZL 1.08
EFIV and MNZL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

