SNPE ranks 2nd and MNZL 43rd of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
MNZL vs SNPE
SNPE −0.30pt a year
0.40%0.10%
SNPE 40.5×the volume
6.45K261K
MNZL vs SNPE Performance
+16.9%+9.5%
- MNZL 0.40%
- SNPE 0.10%, better
- MNZL $39M
- SNPE $2.79B
- MNZL
- SNPE +12.9%
- MNZL
- SNPE 1.00%
- MNZL 483
- SNPE 325
- MNZL 6.45K sh
- SNPE 261K sh, better
- MNZL $60.27
- SNPE $66.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MNZL | SNPE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A97Higher |
| Risk | C47 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | C40Higher |
| Durability | F2 | A70Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. MNZL and SNPE are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MNZLC
SNPEA
In short
MNZL A broad slice of the US market, filtered for faith. MNZL passively tracks a Russell index that screens stocks for Shariah compliance, then adds a second AFSC layer. Ordinary index plumbing, faith-based rules on top. Launched 2025.
SNPE The S&P 500 with roughly 200 names screened out, for 0.10% a year. SNPE keeps the plumbing of a plain core index fund and lets S&P's rules, not a stock picker, decide who stays in the basket.
Stated mandate
MNZL The Fund uses passive indexing to track the total return performance of its Russell index before fees and expenses. The index consists of common stocks and applies Shariah screening followed by AFSC principles.
SNPE The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its underlying index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MNZL vs SNPE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MNZL vs SNPE Cost
Overpaying MNZL vs SNPE
$5,984
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MNZL 0.40%
$8,090
SNPE 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MNZL | SNPE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $183 | $540 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $717 | $2,076 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $2,106 | $5,984 |
- 0.40%MNZL
- 0.10%SNPE, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
SNPE 7th cheapest of 47 funds
MNZL 35th cheapest of 47 funds
MNZL vs SNPE Dividends
- MNZL
- SNPE 1.00%
- MNZL
- SNPE $0.68
- MNZL $0.02
- SNPE $0.18
- MNZL Dec 30, 2025
- SNPE Sep 18, 2026
- MNZL Dec 31, 2025
- SNPE Sep 25, 2026
- MNZL Irregular
- SNPE Quarterly
Distribution history
MNZL vs SNPE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MNZL SNPE 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- MNZL SNPE 1.39
- Worst fall
- MNZL SNPE −24.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MNZL 1.08SNPE 1.01
MNZL and SNPE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
