EFIV ranks 2nd and WOMN 44th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
EFIV vs WOMN
EFIV −0.65pt a year
0.10%0.75%
EFIV 39.1×the volume
59.9K1.53K
EFIV +3.7pt
+11.5%+7.8%
EFIV vs WOMN Performance
+72.7%+45.8%
- EFIV 0.10%, better
- WOMN 0.75%
- EFIV $1B
- WOMN $57M
- EFIV +12.9%, better
- WOMN +12.0%
- EFIV 1.03%, better
- WOMN 0.82%
- EFIV 326
- WOMN 201
- EFIV 59.9K sh, better
- WOMN 1.53K sh
- EFIV $70.67
- WOMN $44.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFIV | WOMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B61 |
| Risk | C51 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A84Higher | F16 |
| Holdings | C43 | B66Higher |
| Durability | B68Higher | C41 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EFIV and WOMN are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFIVA
WOMND
In short
EFIV A screened S&P 500 that still looks like one. EFIV trims to about 300 names on ESG criteria but holds industry-group weights close to the parent index, for 0.10% a year.
WOMN The rare ETF where the fee is part of the pitch: sponsor Impact Shares is itself a 501(c)(3) that routes net advisory profits to YWCA USA, while the portfolio tracks a Morningstar index that scores US companies on gender equality.
Stated mandate
EFIV The Fund seeks to track an index of securities selected using environmental, social, and governance sustainability criteria while retaining industry-group weights broadly similar to the S&P 500 Index.
WOMN The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFIV vs WOMN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFIV vs WOMN Cost
Overpaying WOMN vs EFIV
$12,376
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFIV 0.10%
$2,106
WOMN 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFIV | WOMN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $1,336 | $1,153 |
| 20 | $717 | $5,078 | $4,361 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $14,482 | $12,376 |
- 0.10%EFIV, cheaper
- 0.75%WOMN
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
EFIV 7th cheapest of 47 funds
WOMN 45th cheapest of 47 funds
EFIV vs WOMN Dividends
- EFIV 1.03%, better
- WOMN 0.82%
- EFIV $0.74
- WOMN $0.37
- EFIV $0.20
- WOMN $0.11
- EFIV Sep 21, 2026
- WOMN Sep 29, 2026
- EFIV Sep 23, 2026
- WOMN Sep 30, 2026
- EFIV Quarterly
- WOMN Quarterly
Distribution history
EFIV vs WOMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFIV
- WOMN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFIV 12.3%WOMN 11.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFIV 1.39, betterWOMN 1.02
- Worst fall
- EFIV −24.5%, betterWOMN −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EFIV 1.01WOMN 0.82
EFIV and WOMN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
