ESGU ranks 4th and WOMN 44th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
ESGU vs WOMN
ESGU −0.60pt a year
0.15%0.75%
ESGU 266.7×the volume
409K1.53K
ESGU +2.6pt
+10.4%+7.8%
ESGU vs WOMN Performance
+63.8%+45.8%
- ESGU 0.15%, better
- WOMN 0.75%
- ESGU $17.3B
- WOMN $57M
- ESGU +13.1%, better
- WOMN +12.0%
- ESGU 0.94%, better
- WOMN 0.82%
- ESGU 271
- WOMN 201
- ESGU 409K sh, better
- WOMN 1.53K sh
- ESGU $160.68
- WOMN $44.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ESGU | WOMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A98Higher | B61 |
| Risk | C53 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | F16 |
| Holdings | B59 | B66Higher |
| Durability | A94Higher | C41 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. ESGU and WOMN are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ESGUA
WOMND
In short
ESGU Screening out companies is easy; keeping the market's shape while you do it is the hard part. ESGU's index optimizes toward stronger ESG characteristics while targeting risk and return similar to the broad MSCI USA Index.
WOMN The rare ETF where the fee is part of the pitch: sponsor Impact Shares is itself a 501(c)(3) that routes net advisory profits to YWCA USA, while the portfolio tracks a Morningstar index that scores US companies on gender equality.
Stated mandate
ESGU Seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap U.S. companies selected for favorable environmental, social and governance (ESG) characteristics while seeking risk/return similar to the MSCI USA Index.
WOMN The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ESGU vs WOMN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ESGU vs WOMN Cost
Overpaying WOMN vs ESGU
$11,345
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ESGU 0.15%
$3,137
WOMN 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ESGU | WOMN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,336 | $1,062 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $5,078 | $4,007 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $14,482 | $11,345 |
- 0.15%ESGU, cheaper
- 0.75%WOMN
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
ESGU 13th cheapest of 47 funds
WOMN 45th cheapest of 47 funds
ESGU vs WOMN Dividends
- ESGU 0.94%, better
- WOMN 0.82%
- ESGU $1.55
- WOMN $0.37
- ESGU $0.38
- WOMN $0.11
- ESGU Sep 15, 2026
- WOMN Sep 29, 2026
- ESGU Sep 18, 2026
- WOMN Sep 30, 2026
- ESGU Quarterly
- WOMN Quarterly
Distribution history
ESGU vs WOMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ESGU
- WOMN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ESGU 12.8%WOMN 11.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ESGU 1.35, betterWOMN 1.02
- Worst fall
- ESGU −26.1%WOMN −25.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ESGU 1.04WOMN 0.82
ESGU and WOMN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
