IGF ranks 2nd and EFRA 12th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
EFRA vs IGF
IGF −0.10pt a year
0.47%0.37%
IGF 1027.1×the volume
851874K
IGF +3.3pt
+15.1%+18.4%
EFRA vs IGF Performance
+10.4%+11.2%
- EFRA 0.47%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- EFRA $6M
- IGF $10.9B
- EFRA +10.4%
- IGF +11.2%, better
- EFRA 4.06%, better
- IGF 2.93%
- EFRA 98
- IGF 89
- EFRA 851 sh
- IGF 874K sh, better
- EFRA $34.82
- IGF $65.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFRA | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C48 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A72Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A92Higher |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. EFRA and IGF are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFRAC
IGFA
In short
EFRA Most infrastructure funds buy the toll road. EFRA buys the suppliers: global companies selling energy efficiency, emissions control and resource-optimization solutions, screened by a green-revenue index and priced under the typical theme fund.
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
Stated mandate
EFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. companies providing infrastructure and industrials solutions intended to support energy efficiency, emissions mitigation, pollution reduction, or land and resource optimization.
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFRA vs IGF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFRA vs IGF Cost
Overpaying EFRA vs IGF
$1,905
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFRA 0.47%
$9,418
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFRA | IGF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $670 | $177 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $2,590 | $671 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $7,513 | $1,905 |
- 0.47%EFRA
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
EFRA 10th cheapest of 33 funds
EFRA vs IGF Dividends
- EFRA 4.06%, better
- IGF 2.93%
- EFRA $1.45
- IGF $1.93
- EFRA $0.34
- IGF $0.93
- EFRA Jun 15, 2026
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- EFRA Jun 18, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- EFRA Twice a year
- IGF Twice a year
Distribution history
EFRA vs IGF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFRA 13.9%IGF 12.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFRA 0.78IGF 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- EFRA −16.2%IGF −20.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EFRA 0.77IGF 0.62
EFRA and IGF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



