IGF ranks 2nd and GII 3rd of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs IGF
IGF −0.03pt a year
0.40%0.37%
IGF 21.0×the volume
41.6K874K
GII +0.1pt
+8.3%+8.2%
GII vs IGF Performance
+60.0%+59.9%
- GII 0.40%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- GII $962M
- IGF $10.9B
- GII +11.2%
- IGF +11.2%
- GII 2.69%
- IGF 2.93%, better
- GII 89
- IGF 89
- GII 41.6K sh
- IGF 874K sh, better
- GII $74.56
- IGF $65.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A72 | A72 |
| Tradability | A72 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A85 | A92Higher |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and IGF are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
IGFA
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs IGF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs IGF Cost
Overpaying GII vs IGF
$577
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | IGF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $670 | $53 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $2,590 | $203 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $7,513 | $577 |
- 0.40%GII
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs IGF Dividends
- GII 2.69%
- IGF 2.93%, better
- GII $2.02
- IGF $1.93
- GII $0.78
- IGF $0.93
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- IGF Twice a year
Distribution history
GII vs IGF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GII
- IGF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%IGF 12.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17IGF 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%, betterIGF −20.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56IGF 0.62
GII and IGF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



