PANG ranks 3rd and ELIL 57th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ELIL vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.31pt a year
1.07%0.76%
ELIL 1.9×the volume
86.7K44.6K
ELIL vs PANG Performance
+117.3%+76.3%
- ELIL 1.07%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- ELIL $23M
- PANG $9M
- ELIL +117.3%, better
- PANG +76.3%
- ELIL 7.86%
- PANG
- ELIL 10
- PANG 4
- ELIL 86.7K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- ELIL $40.55
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ELIL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A94Higher |
| Risk | A85Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | B61 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ELIL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ELILB
PANGA
In short
ELIL The leveraged Lilly trade in its cheaper wrapper: 200% of LLY's daily move, priced at 1.07% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027, and below what the only other 2x LLY fund charges.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
ELIL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Eli Lilly and Company's common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ELIL vs PANG Holdings
How ELIL and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ELIL and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ELILMore in PANG | ELIL | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- ELIL100.0%
- PANG210.1%
- ELIL3
- PANG1
Asset class
- ELIL
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ELIL3
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in ELIL
3 securities, 21.8% of ELIL by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50614.88%
- Eli Lilly & Co6.83%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut0.12%
Only in PANG
1 security, 10.0% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.04%
Weight gaps
ELIL and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ELIL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying ELIL vs PANG
$5,159
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ELIL 1.07%
$19,815
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ELIL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,353 | $528 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $5,142 | $1,904 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $14,656 | $5,159 |
- 1.07%ELIL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
ELIL 213th cheapest of 315 funds
ELIL vs PANG Dividends
- ELIL 7.86%
- PANG
- ELIL $3.16
- PANG
- ELIL $0.09
- PANG $1.30
- ELIL Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- ELIL Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- ELIL Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
ELIL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ELIL 77.5%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ELIL 0.85PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- ELIL −56.0%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ELIL 0.45PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.