Skip to content
etf.net

EMAU vs TJUN

Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

EMAUCCboe

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June

TJUNDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

EMAU −0.65pt a year

EMAU0.30%TJUN0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

TJUN 17.7×the volume

EMAU313TJUN5.54K

EMAU vs TJUN Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−6.0%EMAU−6.1%TJUN

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. EMAU −6.0%. TJUN −6.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−2%0%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
EMAU 0.30%, better
TJUN 0.95%
Fund size
EMAU $1M
TJUN $12M
1Y total return
EMAU No data
TJUN −2.5%
Holdings
EMAU 4
TJUN 3
Avg volume (30D)
EMAU 313 sh
TJUN 5.54K sh, better
NAV per share
EMAU $24.10
TJUN $21.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMAU: Cost 90, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 7, Holdings not scored, Durability 5. TJUN: Cost 17, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMAU, TJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMAUTJUN
Cost30% weightA90HigherF17
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD36C42Higher
Tradability15% weightF7B59Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF5B60Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMAU and TJUN are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

EMAU ranks 9th and TJUN 13th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 8CBUFEFT Vest Laddered Emerging Markets Buffer ETFScore 42
  2. Rank 9CEMAUCorgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  3. Rank 9CEMJLCorgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 9CEMMYCorgi Emerging Markets Equities Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 13DTJUNFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - JuneScore 35
  6. Rank 14FARKTARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETFScore 14

EMAU vs TJUN Holdings

How EMAU and TJUN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EMAU and 0.0% of TJUN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for TJUN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EMAU and TJUN, widest gap first
CountryMore in EMAUMore in TJUN
TaiwanSame weight
South KoreaSame weight
ChinaSame weight
IndiaSame weight
BrazilSame weight
South AfricaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
PolandSame weight
Other countries (10)Same weight

Outside the US: EMAU 1% developed, 99% emerging. TJUN 1% developed, 99% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EMAU105.1%
  • TJUN109.1%

Securities held

  • EMAU3
  • TJUN2

Asset class

EMAU
Equity
TJUN
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in EMAU3
  • In both0
  • Only in TJUN2

Only in EMAU

3 securities, 100% of EMAU by weight

  • Eem 07/30/2027 12.86 C76.88%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202715.31%
  • Eem 07/30/2027 64.32 P10.46%

Only in TJUN

2 securities, 100% of TJUN by weight

  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF C 0.7191.62%
  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF P 70.7916.22%

Weight gaps

EMAU and TJUN share no securities.

All EMAU holdings⁠All 4 TJUN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMAU vs TJUN Cost

Overpaying TJUN vs EMAU

$11,720

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMAU 0.30%

    $6,149

  • TJUN 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMAU 0.30%
  • TJUN 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TJUN $17,869EMAU $6,149

Year by year

YearEMAUTJUNOverpaying
10$545$1,678$1,133
20$2,113$6,322$4,209
30$6,149$17,869$11,720

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%EMAU, cheaper
  • 0.95%TJUN
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

EMAU cheapest of 14 funds

TJUN 10th cheapest of 14 funds

EMAU vs TJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
EMAU None
TJUN None

Distribution history

EMAUAll EMAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TJUNAll TJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EMAU vs TJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMAU No dataTJUN 10.0%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMAU No dataTJUN 0.02since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMAU No dataTJUN −9.8%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMAU 0.00TJUN 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • EMAUCvsEBUFB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TJUNDvsEBUFB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EMAUCvsEJANB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TJUNDvsEJANB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EMAUCvsEOCTB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TJUNDvsEOCTB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.