Skip to content
etf.net

EJUL vs TJUN

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

EJULBNYSE Arca

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June

TJUNDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

EJUL −0.06pt a year

EJUL0.89%TJUN0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

EJUL 10.1×the volume

EJUL55.9KTJUN5.54K

EJUL vs TJUN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+1.3%EJUL−2.4%TJUN

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. EJUL +1.3%. TJUN −2.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%7.5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EJUL 0.89%, better
TJUN 0.95%
Fund size
EJUL $210M
TJUN $12M
1Y total return
EJUL +1.3%, better
TJUN −2.4%
Yield (12M)
EJUL 0.00%
TJUN No data
Holdings
EJUL 3
TJUN 3
Avg volume (30D)
EJUL 55.9K sh, better
TJUN 5.54K sh
NAV per share
EJUL $29.60
TJUN $21.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EJUL: Cost 47, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 73, Holdings not scored, Durability 93. TJUN: Cost 17, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for EJUL, TJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEJULTJUN
Cost30% weightC47HigherF17
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55HigherC42
Tradability15% weightA73HigherB59
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA93HigherB60

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EJUL and TJUN are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

EJUL ranks 4th and TJUN 13th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BEBUFInnovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 1BEOCTInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BEJANInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 61
  4. Rank 4BEJULInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 5CEAPRInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 54
  6. Rank 9CEMMYCorgi Emerging Markets Equities Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  7. Rank 13DTJUNFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - JuneScore 35
  8. Rank 14FARKTARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETFScore 14

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EJULBInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

TJUNDFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June

In short

EJUL Buffered downside is easy to find on the S&P 500. EJUL does it on emerging markets: it tracks EEM up to a cap and absorbs the first 15% of losses over a 12-month outcome period that resets every July.

TJUN No data

Stated mandate

EJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF over the outcome period, subject to a stated upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses.

TJUN No data

Why people hold it

  • EJUL The trade is written into the fund's own documents: the first 15% of EEM's decline over the outcome period is absorbed before losses reach you.innovatoretfs.com
  • Emerging markets is thin ground for defined-outcome funds. Innovator's EEM-linked series (EJUL, EJAN, EBUF) is one of the few places this structure exists at all.
  • Running since 2019, and a plain 1940 Act ETF: no K-1, no bank note behind it, unlike the structured products that sell the same payoff shape.innovatoretfs.com
  • One of the easier funds in its buffer peer group to get in and out of, which matters in a category where trading costs can quietly eat the buffer.

TJUN No data

Worth knowing

  • EJUL Buffer and cap are designed around a full July-to-June period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and upside are left, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Upside stops at the cap reset each July, so a runaway emerging markets rally leaves gains on the table. Protection is bought with ceiling.
  • 0.89% a year: median for buffer funds, but many multiples of a plain emerging markets index fund. And it's built for price return, not income.

TJUN No data

Full EJUL profile⁠

Full TJUN profile⁠

EJUL vs TJUN Holdings

How EJUL and TJUN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EJUL and 0.0% of TJUN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile99.0%

Sector

No Sector split for TJUN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EJUL and TJUN, widest gap first
CountryMore in EJULMore in TJUN
South KoreaEJUL +1.0 points
Other countries (17)TJUN +1.0 points

Outside the US: EJUL 1% developed, 99% emerging. TJUN 1% developed, 99% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EJUL105.6%
  • TJUN109.1%

Securities held

  • EJUL3
  • TJUN2

Asset class

EJUL
Equity
TJUN
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in EJUL3
  • In both0
  • Only in TJUN2

Only in EJUL

3 securities, 100% of EJUL by weight

  • Eem 06/30/2027 0.68 C92.25%
  • Eem 06/30/2027 68.41 P13.08%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.27%

Only in TJUN

2 securities, 100% of TJUN by weight

  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF C 0.7191.62%
  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF P 70.7916.22%

Weight gaps

EJUL and TJUN share no securities.

All 6 EJUL holdings⁠All 4 TJUN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EJUL vs TJUN Cost

Overpaying TJUN vs EJUL

$997

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EJUL 0.89%

    $16,872

  • TJUN 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EJUL 0.89%
  • TJUN 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TJUN $17,869EJUL $16,872

Year by year

YearEJULTJUNOverpaying
10$1,576$1,678$102
20$5,953$6,322$369
30$16,872$17,869$997

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%EJUL, cheaper
  • 0.95%TJUN
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

EJUL 5th cheapest of 14 funds

TJUN 10th cheapest of 14 funds

EJUL vs TJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
EJUL 0.00%
TJUN No data
Payout (12M)
EJUL None
TJUN None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

EJUL1 paymentAll EJUL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102019
TJUNAll TJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EJUL vs TJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EJUL 7.8%TJUN 10.0%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EJUL 0.73TJUN 0.02since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EJUL −19.5%TJUN −9.8%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EJUL 0.39TJUN 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • EJULBvsEBUFB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TJUNDvsEBUFB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EJULBvsEOCTB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TJUNDvsEOCTB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EJULBvsEJANB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TJUNDvsEJANB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.