EMXF ranks 1st and EMCS 3rd of 12 funds in the Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index Category.
EMCS vs EMXF
EMCS −0.01pt a year
0.15%0.16%
EMCS 6.2×the volume
52.5K8.51K
EMCS +1.1pt
+7.6%+6.5%
EMCS vs EMXF Performance
+43.9%+36.8%
- EMCS 0.15%, better
- EMXF 0.16%
- EMCS $1.04B
- EMXF $157M
- EMCS +21.7%, better
- EMXF +15.8%
- EMCS 1.57%
- EMXF 2.91%, better
- EMCS 57
- EMXF 586
- EMCS 52.5K sh, better
- EMXF 8.51K sh
- EMCS $43.38
- EMXF $52.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMCS | EMXF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A84 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B57 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | D37 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A74Higher | C49 |
Rank among Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EMCS and EMXF are both graded against the same 12 Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMCSA
EMXFA
In short
EMCS A screened take on emerging markets at core-tracker pricing: 0.15% a year for roughly 70 names carved out of a global selection index. Cheap enough to sit beside the plain-vanilla EM giants, narrow enough to look nothing like them.
EMXF The strict end of ESG in emerging markets. EMXF follows an index that demands stronger ESG ratings, screens out a long list of controversial businesses, and caps any single issuer at 5% so no one giant runs the show.
Stated mandate
EMCS The fund seeks results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its MSCI climate-selection index. The index represents large- and mid-capitalization companies across emerging-market countries and applies ESG and climate screens.
EMXF The fund is designed to follow an emerging-market equity index that emphasizes stronger ESG ratings and applies extensive screens to controversial business activities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMCS vs EMXF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMCS vs EMXF Cost
Overpaying EMXF vs EMCS
$205
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMCS 0.15%
$3,137
EMXF 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMCS | EMXF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $292 | $18 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,141 | $70 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $3,342 | $205 |
- 0.15%EMCS, cheaper
- 0.16%EMXF
- Middle half of Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.33%
EMCS cheapest of 12 funds
EMXF 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
EMCS vs EMXF Dividends
- EMCS 1.57%
- EMXF 2.91%, better
- EMCS $0.67
- EMXF $1.53
- EMCS $0.25
- EMXF $0.47
- EMCS Jun 18, 2026
- EMXF Jun 15, 2026
- EMCS Jun 26, 2026
- EMXF Jun 18, 2026
- EMCS Twice a year
- EMXF Twice a year
Distribution history
EMCS vs EMXF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMCS
- EMXF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMCS 17.2%EMXF 14.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMCS 1.21, betterEMXF 1.04
- Worst fall
- EMCS −38.1%EMXF −30.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EMCS 1.18EMXF 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.