EMCS ranks 3rd and LDEM 4th of 12 funds in the Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index Category.
EMCS vs LDEM
EMCS −0.01pt a year
0.15%0.16%
EMCS 34.6×the volume
52.5K1.52K
EMCS +6.2pt
+7.6%+1.4%
EMCS vs LDEM Performance
+43.9%+7.0%
- EMCS 0.15%, better
- LDEM 0.16%
- EMCS $1.04B
- LDEM $31M
- EMCS +21.7%, better
- LDEM −2.9%
- EMCS 1.57%
- LDEM 3.14%, better
- EMCS 57
- LDEM 447
- EMCS 52.5K sh, better
- LDEM 1.52K sh
- EMCS $43.38
- LDEM $56.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMCS | LDEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A84 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | B57 | B57 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | D37 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A74Higher | D36 |
Rank among Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EMCS and LDEM are both graded against the same 12 Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMCSA
LDEMA
In short
EMCS A screened take on emerging markets at core-tracker pricing: 0.15% a year for roughly 70 names carved out of a global selection index. Cheap enough to sit beside the plain-vanilla EM giants, narrow enough to look nothing like them.
LDEM The budget door into strict ESG in emerging markets. LDEM tracks an MSCI index that keeps the best ESG scorers within each sector, and charges 0.16% to do it, well under the going rate in its peer group.
Stated mandate
EMCS The fund seeks results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its MSCI climate-selection index. The index represents large- and mid-capitalization companies across emerging-market countries and applies ESG and climate screens.
LDEM The fund seeks to track an index of emerging-market companies with high environmental, social, and governance characteristics relative to their sector peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMCS vs LDEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMCS vs LDEM Cost
Overpaying LDEM vs EMCS
$205
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMCS 0.15%
$3,137
LDEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMCS | LDEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $292 | $18 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,141 | $70 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $3,342 | $205 |
- 0.15%EMCS, cheaper
- 0.16%LDEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.33%
EMCS cheapest of 12 funds
LDEM 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
EMCS vs LDEM Dividends
- EMCS 1.57%
- LDEM 3.14%, better
- EMCS $0.67
- LDEM $1.77
- EMCS $0.25
- LDEM $0.50
- EMCS Jun 18, 2026
- LDEM Jun 15, 2026
- EMCS Jun 26, 2026
- LDEM Jun 18, 2026
- EMCS Twice a year
- LDEM Twice a year
Distribution history
EMCS vs LDEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMCS
- LDEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMCS 17.2%LDEM 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMCS 1.21, betterLDEM 0.78
- Worst fall
- EMCS −38.1%LDEM −36.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EMCS 1.18LDEM 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.