XHLF ranks 6th and EMNT 51st of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
EMNT vs XHLF
XHLF −0.21pt a year
0.24%0.03%
XHLF 18.5×the volume
16.1K299K
EMNT +0.5pt
+4.9%+4.4%
EMNT vs XHLF Performance
+3.9%+3.6%
- EMNT 0.24%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- EMNT $260M
- XHLF $2.04B
- EMNT +3.9%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- EMNT 3.86%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- EMNT 253
- XHLF 29
- EMNT 16.1K sh
- XHLF 299K sh, better
- EMNT $98.56
- XHLF $50.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMNT | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | D28 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D30 |
| Durability | B63Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. EMNT and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMNTB
XHLFA
In short
EMNT PIMCO's ultra-short cash-parking playbook, run through an ESG screen. An active manager picking a few hundred short-dated bonds, paying income monthly, for a fee above most of the category.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
EMNT The Fund seeks maximum current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity, using PIMCO’s ESG investment strategy.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMNT vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMNT vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying EMNT vs XHLF
$4,321
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMNT 0.24%
$4,959
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMNT | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $437 | $55 | $382 |
| 20 | $1,699 | $216 | $1,483 |
| 30 | $4,959 | $638 | $4,321 |
- 0.24%EMNT
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
EMNT 60th cheapest of 78 funds
EMNT vs XHLF Dividends
- EMNT 3.86%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- EMNT $3.81
- XHLF $1.85
- EMNT $0.35
- XHLF $0.16
- EMNT Nov 2, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- EMNT Nov 4, 2026
- XHLF Nov 5, 2026
- EMNT Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
EMNT vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMNT 0.5%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMNT 1.01, betterXHLF −0.50
- Worst fall
- EMNT −1.7%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EMNT 0.02XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.24% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.