EMXF ranks 1st and OAEM 11th of 12 funds in the Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index Category.
EMXF vs OAEM
EMXF −1.09pt a year
0.16%1.25%
OAEM 1.9×the volume
8.51K16.5K
OAEM +1.7pt
+20.3%+22.0%
EMXF vs OAEM Performance
+15.8%+28.6%
- EMXF 0.16%, better
- OAEM 1.25%
- EMXF $157M
- OAEM $127M
- EMXF +15.8%
- OAEM +28.6%, better
- EMXF 2.91%, better
- OAEM 0.62%
- EMXF 586
- OAEM 50
- EMXF 8.51K sh
- OAEM 16.5K sh, better
- EMXF $52.30
- OAEM $45.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMXF | OAEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A70Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | B57Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D28 |
| Durability | C49Higher | C42 |
Rank among Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EMXF and OAEM are both graded against the same 12 Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMXFA
OAEMF
In short
EMXF The strict end of ESG in emerging markets. EMXF follows an index that demands stronger ESG ratings, screens out a long list of controversial businesses, and caps any single issuer at 5% so no one giant runs the show.
OAEM Most emerging-markets ESG funds are index trackers with a screen bolted on. OAEM goes the other way: an actively managed, concentrated portfolio shaped by OneAscent's faith-based Elevate screen, at a 1.25% net expense ratio.
Stated mandate
EMXF The fund is designed to follow an emerging-market equity index that emphasizes stronger ESG ratings and applies extensive screens to controversial business activities.
OAEM The fund's stated objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMXF vs OAEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMXF vs OAEM Cost
Overpaying OAEM vs EMXF
$19,273
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMXF 0.16%
$3,342
OAEM 1.25%
$22,615
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMXF | OAEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $2,181 | $1,889 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $8,105 | $6,964 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $22,615 | $19,273 |
- 0.16%EMXF, cheaper
- 1.25%OAEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.33%
EMXF 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
OAEM 12th cheapest of 12 funds
EMXF vs OAEM Dividends
- EMXF 2.91%, better
- OAEM 0.62%
- EMXF $1.53
- OAEM $0.28
- EMXF $0.47
- OAEM $0.28
- EMXF Jun 15, 2026
- OAEM Dec 30, 2025
- EMXF Jun 18, 2026
- OAEM Jan 5, 2026
- EMXF Twice a year
- OAEM Annual
Distribution history
EMXF vs OAEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMXF 14.6%, betterOAEM 19.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMXF 1.04, betterOAEM 0.90
- Worst fall
- EMXF −30.6%OAEM −17.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EMXF 0.94OAEM 1.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.