GOGL ranks 123rd and EOSU 304th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
EOSU vs GOGL
0.0%by weight
GOGL −1.30pt a year
1.50%0.20%
EOSU 19.3×the volume
366K18.9K
EOSU vs GOGL Performance
−82.4%−42.4%
- EOSU 1.50%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- EOSU $6M
- GOGL $4M
- EOSU 3
- GOGL 1
- EOSU 366K sh, better
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- EOSU $1.43
- GOGL $15.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EOSU | GOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | F6 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C53Higher | D36 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. EOSU and GOGL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EOSUF
GOGLC
In short
EOSU Most single-stock leverage rides mega-caps. This one bolts a 2x daily throttle onto one industrials name, Eos Energy Enterprises: today's move, doubled, with the clock reset before tomorrow's open.
Stated mandate
EOSU The Fund seeks 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Its stated objective applies to a single trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EOSU vs GOGL Holdings
How EOSU and GOGL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EOSU and 0.0% of GOGL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for EOSU and GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- EOSU206.3%
- GOGL199.3%
- EOSU1
- GOGL0
Asset class
- EOSU
- Equity
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in EOSU1
- In both0
- Only in GOGL0
Only in EOSU
1 security, 5.9% of EOSU by weight
- First American Government Obli First Am Gov Oblig X5.94%
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Weight gaps
EOSU and GOGL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EOSU vs GOGL Cost
Overpaying EOSU vs GOGL
$22,128
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EOSU 1.50%
$26,283
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EOSU | GOGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $365 | $2,225 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $1,421 | $8,098 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $4,155 | $22,128 |
- 1.50%EOSU
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
EOSU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
EOSU vs GOGL Dividends
- EOSU None
- GOGL None
Distribution history
EOSU vs GOGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- EOSU 8.87GOGL −3.37
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.