Skip to content
etf.net

EOSU vs PANG

T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF

EOSUFCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

PANGANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PANG −0.74pt a year

EOSU1.50%PANG0.76%

Avg volume · 30D

EOSU 8.2×the volume

EOSU366KPANG44.6K

EOSU vs PANG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−82.4%EOSU−1.5%PANG

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. EOSU −82.4%. PANG −1.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−25%25%50%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EOSU 1.50%
PANG 0.76%, better
Fund size
EOSU $6M
PANG $9M
1Y total return
EOSU No data
PANG +76.3%
Holdings
EOSU 3
PANG 4
Avg volume (30D)
EOSU 366K sh, better
PANG 44.6K sh
NAV per share
EOSU $1.43
PANG $31.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EOSU: Cost 11, Risk 6, Mission 83, Tradability 32, Holdings not scored, Durability 53. PANG: Cost 70, Risk 74, Mission 94, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for EOSU, PANG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEOSUPANG
Cost30% weightF11A70Higher
Mission25% weightA83A94Higher
Risk15% weightF6A74Higher
Tradability15% weightD32A74Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC53B59Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EOSU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

PANG ranks 3rd and EOSU 304th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3APANGLeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 5BAMDGLeverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 303FOCNLT-REX 2X Long DOCN Daily Target ETFScore 20
  7. Rank 304FEOSUT-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETFScore 18
  8. Rank 305FSMUPT-Rex 2x Long SMR Daily Target ETFScore 17

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EOSUFT-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF

PANGALeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

In short

EOSU Most single-stock leverage rides mega-caps. This one bolts a 2x daily throttle onto one industrials name, Eos Energy Enterprises: today's move, doubled, with the clock reset before tomorrow's open.

PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

EOSU The Fund seeks 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Its stated objective applies to a single trading day.

PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.

Why people hold it

  • EOSU Does the job it advertises: 200% of Eos Energy's daily move, tracked closely day to day.rexshares.com
  • Doubled exposure inside an ordinary 1940 Act fund. No margin account, no borrowing, and no losing more than you put in.rexshares.com
  • The leverage resets each day, so exposure stays near 2x instead of drifting the way a margin position does.
  • PANG Cheaper of the two 2x PANW funds: 0.76% flat versus 1.08% for PALU, and PALU's number is net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (1.48% gross).direxion.com
  • That 0.76% also sits below the typical fee in the single-stock leveraged category, where costs usually run higher.
  • Hits its 200% daily target closely, one of the tighter implementations among hundreds of single-stock leveraged funds.
  • Leverage arrives inside a standard 1940 Act ETF: no margin agreement, no borrowing, no overnight position to roll yourself.leverageshares.com

Worth knowing

  • EOSU At 1.50% a year, it costs more than the typical 2x single-stock fund; peers like AAPU and GGLL charge under 1%.
  • Hold past a day and compounding takes over: choppy stretches can leave the result far from 2x the stock's move over that span.
  • A young, small fund pinned to one volatile stock, and on cost and risk it sits in the lower reaches of a crowded 2x single-stock field.
  • PANG Daily reset, not a 2x hold. Over weeks the returns compound, and a choppy stretch in PANW can leave the result far from double the move.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, twice the swing. An earnings miss or a cyber headline lands here with double the force, up or down.leverageshares.com
  • Smaller and more lightly traded than the giants of the category, so spreads can widen; limit orders earn their keep.

Full EOSU profile⁠

Full PANG profile⁠

EOSU vs PANG Holdings

How EOSU and PANG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EOSU and 0.0% of PANG.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for EOSU and PANG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EOSU and PANG, widest gap first
CountryMore in EOSUMore in PANG
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EOSU206.3%
  • PANG210.1%

Securities held

  • EOSU1
  • PANG1

Asset class

EOSU
Equity
PANG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EOSU1
  • In both0
  • Only in PANG1

Only in EOSU

1 security, 5.9% of EOSU by weight

  • First American Government Obli First Am Gov Oblig X5.94%

Only in PANG

1 security, 10.0% of PANG by weight

  • First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.04%

Weight gaps

EOSU and PANG share no securities.

All 4 EOSU holdings⁠All 4 PANG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EOSU vs PANG Cost

Overpaying EOSU vs PANG

$11,627

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EOSU 1.50%

    $26,283

  • PANG 0.76%

    $14,656

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EOSU 1.50%
  • PANG 0.76%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530EOSU $26,283PANG $14,656

Year by year

YearEOSUPANGOverpaying
10$2,590$1,353$1,237
20$9,519$5,142$4,377
30$26,283$14,656$11,627

Expense ratio

  • 1.50%EOSU
  • 0.76%PANG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds

EOSU 271st cheapest of 315 funds

EOSU vs PANG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
EOSU None
PANG No data
Last payment
EOSU No data
PANG $1.30
Ex-dividend
EOSU No data
PANG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
EOSU No data
PANG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
EOSU No data
PANG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

EOSUAll EOSU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PANGIrregular · 1 paymentAll PANG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

EOSU vs PANG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EOSU No dataPANG 128.2%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EOSU No dataPANG 0.90since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EOSU No dataPANG −62.4%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EOSU 8.87PANG 3.32

Popular comparisons

  • EOSUFvsTSMGA

    T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EOSUFvsUNHGA

    T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EOSUFvsOKTGA

    T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.