FLAX ranks 3rd and EPP 5th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
EPP vs FLAX
FLAX −0.28pt a year
0.47%0.19%
EPP 26.9×the volume
264K9.82K
FLAX +1.1pt
+6.0%+7.1%
EPP vs FLAX Performance
+34.0%+40.6%
- EPP 0.47%
- FLAX 0.19%, better
- EPP $2.24B
- FLAX $67M
- EPP +12.7%
- FLAX +13.5%, better
- EPP 3.35%, better
- FLAX 2.20%
- EPP 95
- FLAX 1648
- EPP 264K sh, better
- FLAX 9.82K sh
- EPP $55.74
- FLAX $33.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPP | FLAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | B57Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | C48 | B59Higher |
| Durability | B60Higher | D32 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. EPP and FLAX are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPPC
FLAXB
In short
EPP EPP is the Pacific minus Japan: one ticket for the region's developed markets, with Japan deliberately left out so you can size that exposure yourself. It has tracked an MSCI index of roughly 90 stocks since 2001.
FLAX One line item for Asia's markets with Japan left out: roughly 1,600 stocks at 0.19% a year, less than half the median fee among index-tracking peers. Broad, cheap, and thin to trade.
Stated mandate
EPP The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities in the Pacific region, excluding Japan, providing diversified regional exposure.
FLAX The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPP vs FLAX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPP vs FLAX Cost
Overpaying EPP vs FLAX
$5,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPP 0.47%
$9,418
FLAX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPP | FLAX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $347 | $500 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $1,351 | $1,910 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $3,952 | $5,466 |
- 0.47%EPP
- 0.19%FLAX, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
FLAX 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
EPP 5th cheapest of 7 funds
EPP vs FLAX Dividends
- EPP 3.35%, better
- FLAX 2.20%
- EPP $1.87
- FLAX $0.74
- EPP $0.82
- FLAX $0.20
- EPP Jun 15, 2026
- FLAX Jun 26, 2026
- EPP Jun 18, 2026
- FLAX Jul 6, 2026
- EPP Twice a year
- FLAX Twice a year
Distribution history
EPP vs FLAX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPP
- FLAX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPP 13.8%, betterFLAX 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EPP 0.93FLAX 1.03, better
- Worst fall
- EPP −24.2%, betterFLAX −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- EPP 0.79FLAX 1.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.