IPAC ranks 2nd and EPP 5th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
EPP vs IPAC
IPAC −0.38pt a year
0.47%0.09%
EPP 2.7×the volume
264K98.1K
IPAC +1.1pt
+7.3%+8.4%
EPP vs IPAC Performance
+34.0%+47.6%
- EPP 0.47%
- IPAC 0.09%, better
- EPP $2.24B
- IPAC $2.67B
- EPP +12.7%
- IPAC +15.6%, better
- EPP 3.35%
- IPAC 3.86%, better
- EPP 95
- IPAC 1344
- EPP 264K sh, better
- IPAC 98.1K sh
- EPP $55.74
- IPAC $82.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPP | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A77Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A81Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | C48 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B60Higher | C51 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. EPP and IPAC are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPPC
IPACA
In short
EPP EPP is the Pacific minus Japan: one ticket for the region's developed markets, with Japan deliberately left out so you can size that exposure yourself. It has tracked an MSCI index of roughly 90 stocks since 2001.
IPAC The developed Pacific in one line item: roughly 1,400 large, mid and small caps for 0.09% a year, well under the 0.35% median for its international peer group. iShares has run it as a core building block since 2014.
Stated mandate
EPP The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities in the Pacific region, excluding Japan, providing diversified regional exposure.
IPAC The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from the Pacific region.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPP vs IPAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPP vs IPAC Cost
Overpaying EPP vs IPAC
$7,520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPP 0.47%
$9,418
IPAC 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPP | IPAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $165 | $682 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $646 | $2,615 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $1,898 | $7,520 |
- 0.47%EPP
- 0.09%IPAC, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
IPAC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
EPP 5th cheapest of 7 funds
EPP vs IPAC Dividends
- EPP 3.35%
- IPAC 3.86%, better
- EPP $1.87
- IPAC $3.20
- EPP $0.82
- IPAC $0.88
- EPP Jun 15, 2026
- IPAC Jun 15, 2026
- EPP Jun 18, 2026
- IPAC Jun 18, 2026
- EPP Twice a year
- IPAC Twice a year
Distribution history
EPP vs IPAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPP
- IPAC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPP 13.8%IPAC 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EPP 0.93IPAC 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- EPP −24.2%, betterIPAC −27.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EPP 0.79IPAC 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.