RWM ranks 4th and EPV 27th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EPV vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 1881.1×the volume
16K30M
RWM +11.2pt
−22.5%−11.3%
EPV vs RWM Performance
−61.4%−15.9%
- EPV 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- EPV $11M
- RWM $163M
- EPV −21.4%
- RWM −10.1%, better
- EPV 4.45%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- EPV 2
- RWM 3
- EPV 16K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- EPV $18.58
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPV | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | B63Higher |
| Durability | C54 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EPV and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPVC
RWMB
In short
EPV The only US ETF built to target -2x the daily move of developed Europe stocks. Pan-European short exposure from a single ticker, no margin account or borrowed shares, running since 2009.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
EPV EPV seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the daily performance of the FTSE Developed Europe All Cap Index.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPV vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPV vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPV 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPV | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%EPV
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
EPV 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EPV vs RWM Dividends
- EPV 4.45%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- EPV $0.82
- RWM $0.48
- EPV $0.23
- RWM $0.09
- EPV Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- EPV Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- EPV Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
EPV vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPV
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPV 25.4%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EPV −1.34RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- EPV −81.2%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPV −1.25RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.