LGLV ranks 1st and ESMV 10th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
ESMV vs LGLV
LGLV −0.06pt a year
0.18%0.12%
LGLV 45.5×the volume
58426.6K
LGLV +0.4pt
+14.4%+14.8%
ESMV vs LGLV Performance
+13.6%+11.7%
- ESMV 0.18%
- LGLV 0.12%, better
- ESMV $8M
- LGLV $1.2B
- ESMV +13.6%, better
- LGLV +11.7%
- ESMV 1.35%
- LGLV 2.06%, better
- ESMV 161
- LGLV 174
- ESMV 584 sh
- LGLV 26.6K sh, better
- ESMV $32.18
- LGLV $187.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ESMV | LGLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A90Higher |
| Mission | B60 | A93Higher |
| Risk | C51Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | F7 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | B57Higher | C52 |
| Durability | D39 | A74Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. ESMV and LGLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ESMVC
LGLVA
In short
ESMV Minimum volatility with an ESG conscience. ESMV runs MSCI's low-vol optimizer across US large and mid caps, then pushes the result toward better ESG characteristics and lower carbon than the parent index, for 0.18% a year.
LGLV Most low-vol funds run an optimizer. LGLV just ranks the biggest 1,000 US stocks by how calm they have been and gives the quietest ones the heaviest weights, for 0.12% a year.
Stated mandate
ESMV The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities designed to have lower volatility, reduced carbon exposure, and improved environmental, social, and governance characteristics relative to the parent index.
LGLV The fund is designed to provide exposure to U.S. large-capitalization equities selected through a low-volatility index strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ESMV vs LGLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ESMV vs LGLV Cost
Overpaying ESMV vs LGLV
$1,229
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ESMV 0.18%
$3,749
LGLV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ESMV | LGLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $220 | $108 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $859 | $422 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,520 | $1,229 |
- 0.18%ESMV
- 0.12%LGLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
LGLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
ESMV 7th cheapest of 16 funds
ESMV vs LGLV Dividends
- ESMV 1.35%
- LGLV 2.06%, better
- ESMV $0.44
- LGLV $3.88
- ESMV $0.11
- LGLV $0.99
- ESMV Sep 15, 2026
- LGLV Sep 21, 2026
- ESMV Sep 18, 2026
- LGLV Sep 23, 2026
- ESMV Quarterly
- LGLV Quarterly
Distribution history
ESMV vs LGLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ESMV 10.4%, betterLGLV 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ESMV 0.92, betterLGLV 0.86
- Worst fall
- ESMV −19.8%LGLV −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ESMV 0.61LGLV 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.