SMLV ranks 4th and ESMV 10th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
ESMV vs SMLV
SMLV −0.06pt a year
0.18%0.12%
SMLV 6.0×the volume
5843.51K
SMLV +6.7pt
+14.4%+21.1%
ESMV vs SMLV Performance
+13.6%+25.8%
- ESMV 0.18%
- SMLV 0.12%, better
- ESMV $8M
- SMLV $260M
- ESMV +13.6%
- SMLV +25.8%, better
- ESMV 1.35%
- SMLV 2.34%, better
- ESMV 161
- SMLV 393
- ESMV 584 sh
- SMLV 3.51K sh, better
- ESMV $32.18
- SMLV $156.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ESMV | SMLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A90Higher |
| Mission | B60 | B69Higher |
| Risk | C51Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | F7 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A79Higher |
| Durability | D39 | C53Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. ESMV and SMLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ESMVC
SMLVB
In short
ESMV Minimum volatility with an ESG conscience. ESMV runs MSCI's low-vol optimizer across US large and mid caps, then pushes the result toward better ESG characteristics and lower carbon than the parent index, for 0.18% a year.
SMLV Low volatility is usually a large-cap game. SMLV runs the same calm-stocks screen down where the swings actually live: US small caps, roughly 400 of them, for 0.12% a year.
Stated mandate
ESMV The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities designed to have lower volatility, reduced carbon exposure, and improved environmental, social, and governance characteristics relative to the parent index.
SMLV The fund's advertised mandate is exposure to U.S. small-capitalization companies selected for low volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ESMV vs SMLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ESMV vs SMLV Cost
Overpaying ESMV vs SMLV
$1,229
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ESMV 0.18%
$3,749
SMLV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ESMV | SMLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $220 | $108 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $859 | $422 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,520 | $1,229 |
- 0.18%ESMV
- 0.12%SMLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
SMLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
ESMV 7th cheapest of 16 funds
ESMV vs SMLV Dividends
- ESMV 1.35%
- SMLV 2.34%, better
- ESMV $0.44
- SMLV $3.63
- ESMV $0.11
- SMLV $0.97
- ESMV Sep 15, 2026
- SMLV Sep 21, 2026
- ESMV Sep 18, 2026
- SMLV Sep 23, 2026
- ESMV Quarterly
- SMLV Quarterly
Distribution history
ESMV vs SMLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ESMV 10.4%, betterSMLV 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ESMV 0.92SMLV 0.94, better
- Worst fall
- ESMV −19.8%SMLV −20.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ESMV 0.61SMLV 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.